Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Nephrol. May 6, 2018; 7(3): 71-83
Published online May 6, 2018. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v7.i3.71
Table 1 Randomized controlled trials for induction of remission in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitides with renal involvement and cyclophosphamide-sparing regimens
Name of the Trial (number of patients)Inclusion criteriaTreatment groups (drug dose)Primary end pointsOutcome
CYCLOPS[7] (149)New diagnosis of GPA, MPA, or relapse with renal involvement, creatinine 150–500 μmol/L (1.7- 5.66 mg/dL)Intravenous pulse CYC (15 mg/kg) vs Daily oral CYC (2 mg/kg)Remission, Time to relapsePulse CYC not inferior to oral CYC Less leucopenia and trend towards more relapses with pulse CYC
CORTAGE[8] (104)New diagnosis of MPA, GPA, EGPA, PAN and age > 65 yrRapid CCS tapering and reduced-dose intravenous pulse CYC (500 mg) vs Standard intravenous pulse CYC (500 mg/m²)Severe adverse eventsLess severe adverse events with reduced immunosuppression, no difference in remission and relapse rates
RAVE[10] (197)New or relapsing GPA or MPA creatinine ≤ 353.6 μmol/L (4 mg/dL)RTX (4 × 375 mg/m² infusions) vs Daily oral CYCComplete remission and cessation of CCS at 6 moRTX not inferior to oral CYC, RTX better in patients with relapse than after first diagnosis
RITUXVAS[11] (44)New diagnosis of AAV and severe renal involvementRTX (4 × 375 mg/m² infusions) plus two intravenous pulses of CYC vs intravenous pulse CYC onlySustained remissionRTX not inferior to pulse CYC