Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Nephrol. Nov 6, 2016; 5(6): 531-537
Published online Nov 6, 2016. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i6.531
Table 2 Desensitisation protocol and outcome
Patient 1Patient 2Patient 3
Before desensitization with original donor
LCM/DTT/AHG (%)80/80/905/5/75/0/5
T/B FCM (MCS)260/298Neg/23680/159
DSA class 1A1 = 8000, B57 = 6200No DSAB44 = 4188, A31 1100
DSA class 2DQ7 = 1600, DQ9 = 2200DQ2 = 9000No DSA
DP8TPE + 8Bort/MP/IVIG + TAC/MMF9TPE + 6Bort/MP/IVIG + R + TAC/MMF4TPE + 4Bort/MP/IVIG + TAC/MMF
After desensitization with original donor
LCM80/80/9017/15/205/0/7
FCM254/333Neg/504Neg/129
DSA class 1A1 = 2000, B57 = 5500No DSAB44 = 4622, A31 = 1400
DSA class 2DQ7 = 2000, DQ9 = 2000DQ2 = 12000No DSA
Side effectsTuberculosisGraft nephrectomyTuberculosis