Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Nephrol. May 6, 2016; 5(3): 233-257
Published online May 6, 2016. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i3.233
Published online May 6, 2016. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i3.233
Ref. | Study design | Kidney Function | Subjects/group | Amount of soy protein used | Control/comparator protein | Duration of intervention | Outcomes | Notes |
Bilo et al[122] | Single meal intervention study (crossover) | Normal healthy subjects | 6 normal subjects; 5 M, 1 F | Studies in normal subjects only: 80 g soy protein in single oral administration | Studies in normal subjects only: 80 g lactoprotein or beef protein or 36 g amino acids | Normal subjects: 8 individual renal function tests run on separate days | Soy protein ingestion induced significantly lower rises in GFR and ERPF compared to beef protein but not compared to lactoprotein or 36 g amino acid ingestion | Subjects with chronic renal insufficiency (PKD, NS, or MGP) were studied in a separate series of experiments in this publication, but were not used to evaluate soy protein |
Buzio et al[127] | Single meal intervention study (crossover) | Normal healthy subjects | 7 (gender not specified) | 80 g (0.9-1.3 g.kg BW) | 80 g red meat or 80 g dairy (cheese) | Single meal interventions conducted 1 wk apart | CrCl and urinary protein were not different between protein loads | Publication describes 2 separate experiments; soy protein effects on renal function only assessed in second experimental protocol |
UAp was significantly lower after soy protein meal versus red meat or cheese meals (P < 0.01) (samples taken 4 h post-meal) | ||||||||
Water excretion rate was higher after soy protein load versus meat (P < 0.05) or cheese (P < 0.01) | ||||||||
Serum total protein was lower after soy protein load compared to meat (P < 0.01) or cheese (P < 0.01) loads | ||||||||
Deibert et al[126] | Single meal intervention study (crossover) | Normal healthy and metabolic syndrome subjects; all with normal kidney function | 10 subjects per group (All males) | 1st intervention: 1 g/kg/BW soy protein: Milk protein (83% soy protein); | N/A | Single meal intervention in normal healthy subjects; 2 meal interventions in subjects with metabolic syndrome (1 wk apart) | Patients with metabolic syndrome had significantly elevated baseline GFR and ERPF compared to healthy subjects (P = 0.02) | 0.3 g/kg/BW is amount of protein used in meal replacement therapy |
2nd intervention same protein source at 0.3 g/kg BW | After ingestion of 1 g/kg/BW protein, GFR and ERPF increased in both groups however the subjects with metabolic syndrome had significantly higher increases in GFR (P < 0.002) and ERPF (P < 0.02) compared to normal subjects; no significant effect of ingestion of 0.3 g/kg per BW protein on renal parameters in subjects with metabolic syndrome | |||||||
Howe et al[118] | Single meal intervention study (Latin square crossover) | Healthy PM women | 8 F subjects | 45 g soy protein | 0 g protein, 45 g beef or dairy protein (cottage cheese) | Single meal intervention; 6 meal interventions (1 wk apart) | Urinary Ca excretion was significantly greater after 45 g protein meal for all proteins compared to basal (0 g protein) meal (P < 0.05) | |
% Ca resorbed by the kidney was significantly reduced after the dairy and soy protein meals (P < 0.05) | ||||||||
Serum ionized Ca was unaffected, however, serum P was significantly lowered by all protein meals (P < 0.05) compared to 0 g protein meal | ||||||||
Soy protein meal significantly reduced calcitonin versus baseline (P < 0.05) however, all protein means tended to lower calcitonin compared to baseline | ||||||||
Dairy protein significantly increased PTH (P < 0.05) compared to baseline, however all protein meals tended to elevate PTH compared to baseline | ||||||||
Serum insulin was significantly increased by all protein meals (over time) compared 0 g protein meal (P < 0.05) | ||||||||
Kontessis et al[70] | Single meal intervention study (crossover) | Normal healthy subjects | 7 M subjects | 80 g soy protein | 80 g lean beef | 2 separate single meal interventions | GFR and ERPF increased significantly after acute beef protein load (P < 0.005 compared to baseline) but did not increase with soy protein load | Amount of soy protein in vegetable protein diet in the reported chronic study was not specified so is therefore not summarized |
Renal vascular resistance fell significantly after beef load (P < 0.05) but was unchanged after soy protein load; plasma 6-keto-PGF1α rose significantly after meat load (P < 0.05) but not after soy protein load | ||||||||
Fractional albumin and IgG clearance rose after beef load (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively) but did not change significantly after soy protein load; plasma protein concentrations were not different between different protein loads; UAp was not different between groups | ||||||||
Plasma glucagon increase was higher after meat load (P < 0.05) compared to soy protein load; no differences were seen between proteins on plasma insulin or growth hormone | ||||||||
Nakamura et al[123] | Single meal intervention study (crossover) | Healthy and T2D subjects (T2D divided into 3 groups based on AER: Group A ≤ 20 μg/min (Normal); B = 20-200 μg/min; C ≥ 200 μg/min | 11 healthy subjects (8M, 3F); 20 T2D patients (10 M, 10 F) | 1g/kg soy protein (as bean curd) | 1 g/kg tuna fish protein | Meals fed on separate days | In healthy subjects, eGFR increased (P < 0.01) after tuna meal but no significant difference after soybean curd meal | |
In Grp A, eGFR increased with tuna meal (P < 0.01) but not after soybean curd | ||||||||
In Group B there was no difference in GFR with either protein | ||||||||
In group C, GFR sig decreased after tuna meal (P < 0.05) but not with soy protein | ||||||||
No changes in AER with any protein in any group | ||||||||
Nakamura et al[124] | Single meal intervention study (crossover) | Healthy and T2D subjects | 10 healthy subjects and 6 T2D subjects | 0.7 g/kg soy protein (as bean curd) | 0.7 g/kg tuna fish protein or egg white protein or dairy protein (cheese) | Meals fed on separate days | eGFR was only significantly increased after ingestion of tuna fish protein (P < 0.001) and not after consumption of soy, egg white or dairy proteins | |
Orita et al[125] | Single meal intervention study (crossover) | Healthy subjects | 6 male subjects | 86.9 g soy protein | 86.9 g beef protein or fasting (0 g protein) | Meals fed 1 wk apart | Inulin clearance (GFR) was significantly increased over baseline at 2 h post beef or soy protein compared to fasting (P < 0.005 and P < 0.05, respectively) | First study to show an increase in GFR after a soy protein load in healthy subjects |
Creatinine clearance (GFR) was significantly increased by both beef and soy proteins at 2 and 3 h post-ingestion compared to fasting (P < 0.01) | ||||||||
Plasma glucagon was significantly increased at 1 to 3 h post-ingestion by both beef and soy protein compared to fasting (P < 0.01) |
- Citation: McGraw NJ, Krul ES, Grunz-Borgmann E, Parrish AR. Soy-based renoprotection. World J Nephrol 2016; 5(3): 233-257
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v5/i3/233.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v5.i3.233