Matrix metalloproteinase-2 as a superior biomarker for peritoneal deterioration in peritoneal dialysis

doi:10.5527/wjn.v5.i2.204

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 5, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7247)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

470

WORD

389

HTML

3442

Figures (1-3)

216

Tables (1-6)

227

Sum=4744

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

853

Download

1650

Sum=2503

Mar 6, 2016 (publication date) through Jan 7, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (4)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Nephrology

ISSN

2220-6124

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Nephrol. Mar 6, 2016; 5(2): 204-212
Published online Mar 6, 2016. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i2.204

Table 2 Biomarker levels in the peritoneal effluent

Biomarker	Level in the peritoneal effluent
Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (ng/mL)	159 (14, 107, 220, 681)
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)	14.6 (1.5, 7.6, 29.6, 253.5)
Hyaluronan (ng/mL)	109 (5.1, 53, 204, 889)
Cancer antigen 125 (U/mL)	6.7 (0.7, 4.0, 12.1, 91.8)

Data are expressed as median with minimum value, interquartile range, and maximum value.

Citation: Hirahara I, Kusano E, Morishita Y, Inoue M, Akimoto T, Saito O, Muto S, Nagata D. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 as a superior biomarker for peritoneal deterioration in peritoneal dialysis. World J Nephrol 2016; 5(2): 204-212
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v5/i2/204.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v5.i2.204