Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Nephrol. Feb 6, 2015; 4(1): 127-137
Published online Feb 6, 2015. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.127
Figure 3
Figure 3 Odds to left ventricular hypertrophy (increased left ventricular myocardial mass assessed by echocardiography). Comparison of prevalence of LVH within the wild MTHFR genotype (12/94; 12.7%) vs the polymorphism MTHFR group (131/470; 27.9%): OR = 0.3787; 95%CI: 0.2000 to 0.7171; Z statistic 2.981; P = 0.0029, i.e., the wild MTHFR genotype bears a significantly lower risk of LVH in comparison with all MTHFR polymorphisms. The individual odds of LVH, according to the specific MTHFR polymorphism status are as follows: Heterozygous C677T (12/94; 12.7% vs 36/118); OR = 3.0000, 95%CI: 1.4581 to 6.1725, Z statistic 2.985, P = 0.0028; Heterozygous A1298C (12/94; 12.7% vs 18/76); OR = 2.1207, 95%CI: 0.9490 to 4.7393, Z statistic 1.832, P = 0.0669; Compound Heterozygous C677T and A1298C (12/94; 12.7% vs 44/154); OR = 2.7333, 95%CI: 1.3581 to 5.5012, Z statistic 2.818, P = 0.0048; Homozygous A1298C (12/94; 12.7% vs 13/80); OR = 1.3259, 95%CI: 0.5676 to 3.0972, Z statistic 0.652, P = 0.5146; Homozygous C677T (12/94; 12.7% vs 20/104); OR = 1.6270, 95%CI: 0.7475 to 3.5410, Z statistic 1.227, P = 0.2199. LVH: Left ventricular hypertrophy; MTHFR: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; OR: Odds ratio.