Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Nephrol. Feb 6, 2015; 4(1): 111-117
Published online Feb 6, 2015. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.111
Published online Feb 6, 2015. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.111
Table 4 Treatment outcomes of ureteroscopy for multiple kidney stones
| Ref | Study type | No. of | Mean number | Mean number | SFR after the | SFR after the |
| patients | of stones | of operation | 1st operation | 2nd operation | ||
| Breda et al[43] | Single center, retrospective, unilateral kidney | 51 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 64.7% | 92.2% |
| Herrera-Gonzalez et al[44] | Single center, retrospective, unilateral kidney | 125 | 3.59 | 1 | 74.4% | NA |
| Huang et al[45] | Single center, retrospective, bilateral kidney | 25 | 5.1 | 1.5 | 50% | 92% |
- Citation: Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Appropriate kidney stone size for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: When to switch to a percutaneous approach. World J Nephrol 2015; 4(1): 111-117
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v4/i1/111.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.111