Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Nephrol. Nov 6, 2014; 3(4): 249-255
Published online Nov 6, 2014. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.249
Published online Nov 6, 2014. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.249
Table 3 Checklist for the planning and validation of a clinical audit
Item | Yes/ No |
Promoting a clinical audit | The audit topic has been decided according to the needs of the working group. |
The objectives are clearly specified. | |
Indicators, criteria and reference standards have been set according to literature, guidelines and/or the consensus among experts. | |
Design and planning | The audit has been organized in different stages and times, assigning specific responsibilities. |
Necessary resources have been allocated. | |
The population/reference sample has been defined. | |
Tools for data collection have been designed, preliminarily defining data management methods. | |
The whole material has been proposed in advance to the participants. | |
Data collection | Those who participated in the preventive phase have been involved. |
The established phases have been met. | |
Data have been correctly collected. | |
Data analysis Interventions | The results have been discussed with the participants to the audit and other interested parties. |
A structured strategy to implement changes has been defined. | |
Written reports of the results have been made and sent to all the participants. | |
Checking the audit effectiveness | A check of the effectiveness of the changes introduced has been planned. |
The verification has been formally documented. |
- Citation: Esposito P, Dal Canton A. Clinical audit, a valuable tool to improve quality of care: General methodology and applications in nephrology. World J Nephrol 2014; 3(4): 249-255
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v3/i4/249.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.249