Minireviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Nephrol. Nov 6, 2014; 3(4): 237-242
Published online Nov 6, 2014. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.237
Table 2 Insulin resistance and uric acid stone formation
Ref.TypeYearnStudy populationRelevant variablesConclusion
Lieske et al[30]Retrospective, Case Control, single county in Minnesota20067122Known stone former vs ControlStone analysis, metabolic evaluationDM, obesity, and HTN are associated with the development of kidney stones. DM is significantly associated with UA stone formation
Daudon et al[10]Cross-sectional20062464DM vs Non-DM stone formersStone analysis, BMI, clinical and lab data in a subset of stone formersDM is associated with a higher overall frequency of kidney stones, specifically, UA. UA stone formation can reflect IR and patients should be evaluated for MetS and/or DM if UA stones are diagnosed.
Akman et al[11]Retrospective, single institution2012146MetS vs Non-MetS undergoing PCNLKidney stone analysis, imaging for initial/recurrent kidney stone diagnosis, baseline blood chemistry and urinalysisPatients with MetS have a higher frequency of UA stones (21.9% vs 4.1%) and a higher rate of all stone recurrence following PCNL
Cho et al[12]Retrospective, three institutions2012712MetS vs Non-MetS undergoing endourologic intervention for stonesStone analysis, metabolic data, International Diabetes Federation definition for MetSMetS, specifically the traits of impaired fasting glucose and hypertriglyceridemia, is significantly associated with UA stone formation, but calcium based stones remain most common in this group
Kadlec et al[31]Retrospective, single institution2012590All stone formers undergoing endourologic interventionStone analysis, MetS factors (presence of obesity, DM, HTN, and HL)DM and HTN, components of MetS, are significantly associated with UA containing stones
Stansbridge et al[32]Retrospective, single institution20131504UA stone formers vs Non-UA24H urine, stone analysis, relevant underlying diagnoses, including DMUA containing stones are increased in DM, but calcium containing stones are still the most common in DM
Inci et al[33]Case-control, single institution201299Control vs Stone formers (sub-stratified by stone type)Stone analysis, metabolic evaluationBMI and Hyperlipidemia, two major traits of IR/MetS, are significantly associated with calcium and UA stone formation
Zhou et al[34]Retrospective, single institution2013269UA stone formers vs Non-UA stone formers undergoing PCNLCT for visceral fat area measurement, stone analysis, metabolic evaluationHTN and visceral fat area, two traits highly associated with IR/MetS, are independent risk factors associated with UA stone formation