Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Nephrol. May 6, 2013; 2(2): 17-25
Published online May 6, 2013. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v2.i2.17
Published online May 6, 2013. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v2.i2.17
Ref. | Study population | Intervention | Study findings | Limitations |
Neal et al[61], 2001 | 18 liver transplant recipients with gout (n = 8) and hyperuricemia (n = 10) | Allopurinol (dose not stated) | Mean serum creatinine decreased from 2.0 to 1.8 mg/dL over a median period of 3 mo | Retrospective study; indication bias; small sample size |
Fairbanks et al[62], 2002 | 27 patients with FJHN | Allopurinol (dose not stated) | Early treatment associated with slower decline of renal function | Case series, single center, partially inadequate controls |
Siu et al[63], 2006 | 54 CKD patients with proteinuria > 0.5 g per day, serum creatinine > 1.4 mg/dL and serum uric acid > 7.6 mg/dL | Allopurinol 100-200 mg daily or their usual therapy for 12 mo | Lower serum creatinine in the allopurinol arm than the control arm (2.0 ± 0.9 vs 2.9 ± 0.9 mg/dL; P = 0.08) and no differences in effect on proteinuria (2.53 ± 4.85 g per day vs 2.16 ± 1.93 g per day; P = NS) | Small sample size, open-label design, short duration of follow-up |
Shelmadine et al[64], 2009 | 12 prevalent adult hemodialysis patients | Allopurinol 300 mg twice daily for 3 mo | Reduction in LDL cholesterol by 0.36 μmol/L (14 mg/dL) (P = 0.04) | No control arm; small sample size; no safety data; no data on hemodynamic parameters; dose of allopurinol higher than recommended |
Goicoechea et al[65], 2010 | 113 CKD patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 | Allopurinol 100 mg daily or no study medication for 24 mo | Allopurinol slowed the decline in eGFR (1.3 ± 1.3 mL/min per 1.73 m2vs–3.3 ± 1.2 mL/min per 1.73 m2); no effect on BP | Small sample size; open label and single-center study; allocation concealment unclear; assessor blinding unclear |
Kao et al[66], 2011 | 53 stage 3 CKD patients with LVH | Allopurinol 300 mg daily or placebo for 9 mo | Allopurinol reduced LVMI (–1.42 ± 4.67 g/m2vs 1.28 ± 4.45 g/m2) and improved brachial artery FMD (1.26% ± 3.06% vs -1.05% ± 2.84%); improved augmentation index (P = 0.015) | Surrogate end-points only |
Momeni et al[67], 2010 | 40 patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy (proteinuria > 500 mg/24 h, and serum creatinine < 3.0 mg/dL) | Allopurinol 100 mg or placebo | Treated patients had lower serum UA and 24 h proteinuria after 4 mo of follow-up | Small sample size, single-center, short follow-up, blinding unclear |
Kanbay et al[68], 2011 | 30 hyperuricemic subjects vs 37 hyperuricemic and 30 normouricemic controls | 4 mo treatment with allopurinol, 300 mg vs no study medication | Allopurinol treated patients had increased e-GFR with respect to baseline | Small sample size, short duration, blinding unclear |
- Citation: Bellomo G. Uric acid and chronic kidney disease: A time to act? World J Nephrol 2013; 2(2): 17-25
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v2/i2/17.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v2.i2.17