Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Nephrol. Jun 25, 2025; 14(2): 103035
Published online Jun 25, 2025. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i2.103035
Published online Jun 25, 2025. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i2.103035
Table 5 Summary of treatment given to our patients, n (%)
| Treatment given | Group 1: Score 0-6 (n = 83) | Group 2: Score 7-14 (n = 76) | Group 3: Score 15-20 (n = 12) | P value |
| Non-surgical treatment (n = 32) | 32 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | < 0.01 |
| DJ stenting (n = 127) | 49 (59) | 72 (94.7) | 6 (50) | < 0.01 |
| Percutaneous nephrostomy (n = 26) | 4 (4.8) | 14 (18.4) | 8 (66.7) | < 0.01 |
| Percutaneous catheter drainage (n = 28) | 5 (6) | 16 (21.1) | 7 (58.3) | < 0.01 |
| Need for hemodialysis (n = 31) | 5 (6) | 15 (19.7) | 11 (91.7) | < 0.01 |
| Early nephrectomy (n = 8) | 0 (0) | 2 (2.6) | 6 (50) | < 0.01 |
| Mortality (n = 8) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) | 7 (58.3) | < 0.01 |
- Citation: Krishnamoorthy S, Thiruvengadam G, Sekar H, Palaniyandi V, Ramadurai S, Narayanasamy S. Modified National Early Warning Score 2, a reliable early warning system for predicting treatment outcomes in patients with emphysematous pyelonephritis. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(2): 103035
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v14/i2/103035.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v14.i2.103035