Copyright
©2012 Baishideng.
World J Nephrol. Aug 6, 2012; 1(4): 106-122
Published online Aug 6, 2012. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v1.i4.106
Published online Aug 6, 2012. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v1.i4.106
Ref. | No. | Trial/protocol | Results | Comments |
Mahaldar et al[132] | 100 | Mupirocin vs Gentamicin | No difference in ESI rates | Trend to higher peritonitis in gentamicin group. Retrospective study |
Wong et al[133] | 154 | Mupirocin vs Control | Mupirocin effective in preventing G+ve peritonitis | Randomised controlled trial. No adverse effects with mupirocin |
Fong[122] | 69 | Providone-iodine vs Control | PVI 2.9% | Nasal carriers high in PVI group! |
Control 8.8% | Randomised controlled trial | |||
Bernardini et al[134] | 133 | Gentamicin (67) vs Mupirocin (66) | 0.23 peritonitis episodes per patient-year (gentamicin) vs 0.54 for mupirocin | Time to first infection longer with Gentamicin |
McQuillan et al[135] | 201 | Polysporin Triple Ointment (P3) vs Mupirocin | No difference in time to ESI or peritonitis but higher rate of fungal infections and more redness of exit site in P3 group | Multicentre randomised controlled trial |
- Citation: Akoh JA. Peritoneal dialysis associated infections: An update on diagnosis and management. World J Nephrol 2012; 1(4): 106-122
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v1/i4/106.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v1.i4.106