Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Virology. May 12, 2015; 4(2): 78-95
Published online May 12, 2015. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v4.i2.78
Published online May 12, 2015. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v4.i2.78
Table 3 Comparison of human enterovirus 71 vaccine strategies
Vaccines | Tested | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref. |
Live-attenuated vaccine | In vitro / in vivo | Broad spectrum, low cost | Incomplete attenuation | [143-149] |
Inactivated vaccine | In vitro / in vivo / clinical trial | Inability to replicate | High cost | [150-162] |
Subunit vaccine | In vitro / in vivo | Safe to use | Low immunogenicity | [153,154,163-178] |
Synthetic peptides | In vitro / in vivo | Small and safe to use | Low immunogenicity, escape mutants | [94,179-181] |
Virus-like particles | In vitro / in vivo | Safe to use | Unstable, need purification, high cost | [162,182-185] |
DNA vaccine | In vitro / in vivo | Most resemble native virus, fast production, low cost, can be manipulated | Low neutralising effect | [153,186-190] |
- Citation: Kok CC. Therapeutic and prevention strategies against human enterovirus 71 infection. World J Virology 2015; 4(2): 78-95
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v4/i2/78.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v4.i2.78