Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Virol. May 25, 2022; 11(3): 113-128
Published online May 25, 2022. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v11.i3.113
Published online May 25, 2022. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v11.i3.113
Study design | Inclusion criteria | Interventions | Number of patients | Results | Ref. | ||
Observational retrospective | Severe SARS-CoV-2 positive ICU admitted patients, with or without respiratory failure | Single 400 mg TCZ dose, without antimicrobialprophylaxis | 55 severe patients were treated,Compared with 41 untreated (non-severe) patients | Lower mortality rate among treated patients against more disease severity, with no serious side effects and no significantly different increased infection rates | [53] | ||
Quasi-experimental | SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with respiratory failure or a need for supplemental oxygen, with clinical or laboratory signs of acute inflammation | Comparing CSs, and TCZ (8 mg/kg up to 800 mg/dose up to 3 doses) | 33 patients in the TCZ group and 60 in the CS group. | These drugs both reduced the need for supplemental oxygen and ICU stay to the same level, but in the CS group the survival rate was higher, use of TCZ was safe | [100] | ||
Cohort | COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure and acute inflammatory laboratory findings, such as an elevated CRP level | Anakinra: 5 mg/kg BD until clinical improvement; TCZ: 400 mg single dose, repeated according to the clinical condition; Sarilumab: 400 mg single dose | 62 patients received IL-1 blocker and 55 IL-6 blocker (26 sarilumab and 29 TCZ) (severe patients); 275 without IL blockade (standard of care only) | IL-6 blockade had only limited effectiveness in individuals with high concentrations of CRP, but IL-1 blockade reduced the mortality rate in all patients | [50] | ||
Retrospective observational | Severe patients | Tocilizumab use was compared with standard of care in ICU patients | 78 severe patients received tocilizumab and were compared with 112 severe patients who received standard of care | Patients on tocilizumab had a longer hospital and ICU stay and more costs with no reduction in the mortality rate | [101] | ||
Retrospective observational | Severe SARS-CoV-2 patients with respiratory failure | TCZ 8 mg/kg | 30 severe patients with respiratory failure who received TCZ were evaluated for inflammatory markers and clinical condition after treatment | Patients had better oxygenation and inflammatory markers decreased after treatment with TCZ | [102] | ||
Randomized, double-blindclinical trial | Hospitalized patients without respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation, but with decreased SpO2 in room air | 8 mg/kg up to 800 mg, TCZ; One-two doses | 249 TCZ; 128 SOC | Likelihood ratio of; serious adverse outcomes were significantly lower in the treatment group; But no reduction in all-cause mortality rate | [8] | ||
Clinical trial | Moderate and severe patients according to the clinical status, with higher IL-6 levels, neither ICU admitted nor on mechanical ventilation | TCZ 400 mg; Single-dose | 29 patients were treated with TCZ and 32 received standard of care only | TCZ was safe but did not show any significant difference in clinical improvement | [103] | ||
Cross-sectional, observational | Severe patients with high levels of inflammatory markers | TCZ 4 mg/kg | 54 patients were treated with TCZ | Significant reduction in neutrophil count and CRP | [104] | ||
Clinical trial | Patients with hyper-inflammatory state and acute respiratory failure | TCZ 8 mg/kg (up to 800 mg); After 12 h: second dosage | 66 severe patients received TCZ and were compared with 60 patients who received standard of care | Not effective in decreasing the risk of disease deterioration | [105] | ||
Open-label clinical trial | Proven SARS-CoV-2 infection, with the need for respiratory support and recent worsening in the clinical condition | TCZ 8 mg/kg | 46 moderate and severe patients were treated with TCZ | Treatment improved respiratory function | [48] | ||
Clinical trial | High levels of IL-6Moderate and severe disease severity | TCZ 400 mg (second dosage after 24h) | 34 patients were treated and 31 were not | Treatment with TCZ improved respiratory condition without reducing the mortality rate | [106] | ||
Clinical trial | Severe and critical patients | Sarilumab 400 mg | Total = 416 (Sarilumab 400 mg, n = 173; Placebo, n = 84; Sarilumab 200 mg, n = 159); Primary analysis between 194 severely ill patients who needed respiratory support | Did not meet the primary and secondary endpoints in improving disease progression and the study stopped further recruitment | NCT04315298 [107,108] | ||
Randomized, double-blindclinical trial | Severe patients with decreased SpO2 without supplemental oxygen | TCZ 8 mg/kg up to 800 mg | 2:1 Placebo+ Standard of care (151); TCZ+ SOC (301) | No significant benefits on mortality rate or clinical improvement, but a positive effect on hospitalization duration was observed with no significant side effects compared with the control group | NCT04320615 [109] | ||
Retrospective cohort | SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with severe pneumonia | TCZ one to two doses, 400–800 mg every 12 h | n = 62 treated, n = 86 untreated | Treated patients showed significantly lower leukocytosis compared to the control group after 14 d. D-dimer and ferritin initially increased and then decreased in the treated group. The mortality rate at 28 d was statistically lower in the TCZ group. A longer hospital stay was shown in these patients although this was not statistically significant. Ten patients developed an infection during hospitalization | [62] | ||
Retrospective cohort | Moderate to severe SARS-CoV-2 patients | One to two doses of TCZ 8 mg/kg | 170 treated; 655 untreated | Clinical improvement was significantly better in the treatment group compared with the control group. A significant reduction in the mortality rate at 21 and 28 d was found in patients with respiratory failure and patients with IL-6 levels above 100 pg/mL | [110] | ||
Randomized clinical trial | Critical patients with respiratory failure who were admitted to the ICU | TCZ one to two doses (8 mg/kg); Sarilumab (a single dose of 400 mg); Other interventions: Anakinra and interferon beta-1a | 350 on TCZ; 45 on sarilumab; 1136 on another immunomodulator; 397 on no immunomodulation | IL-6 blocking agents were effective in reducing the mortality rate. When added to corticosteroids, this effect was stronger compared with IL-6 blockade alone | NCT02735707 [74] | ||
Randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial | COVID-19 patients with worsening clinical status or with high CRP levels after 21 d of the first randomization to dexamethasone, lopinavir–ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, or colchicine or convalescent plasma or a combination of two anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies (REGN-COV2) or aspirin | A single dose of TCZ according to the patient’s weight | 2022 received TCZ; 2094 received standard of care | TCZ group had a significantly lower mortality rate, need for mechanical ventilation, and higher chance of hospital discharge at day 28. This effect was similar in patients randomized less than or more than two days from hospitalization. In patients who were on mechanical ventilation at the time of drug administration, this drug had no significant effect on improving prognosis | [67] | ||
Randomized, double-blindclinical trial | Severe COVID-19 patients | Sarilumab 200 or 400 mg, single dose | n = 153 sarilumab 400 mg, n = 141 sarilumab 200 mg, n = 75 placebo | No significant effectiveness was found in the treatment groups compared with the control group | [111] | ||
Randomized, double-Blind, placebo-controlled trial | Patients with COVID-19 in a hyper-inflammatory state | TCZ 8 mg/kg up to 800 mg | TCZ (n = 161); Placebo (n = 81) + standard of care | No significant benefits from early TCZ administration in COVID-19 were observed | [112] |
- Citation: Bahmani M, Chegini R, Ghanbari E, Sheykhsaran E, Shiri Aghbash P, Leylabadlo HE, Moradian E, Kazemzadeh Houjaghan AM, Bannazadeh Baghi H. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: Role of interleukin-6 and the inflammatory cascade. World J Virol 2022; 11(3): 113-128
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v11/i3/113.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v11.i3.113