Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Virol . Feb 12, 2012; 1(1): 31-43
Published online Feb 12, 2012. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v1.i1.31
Published online Feb 12, 2012. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v1.i1.31
Tests | Advantages | Disadvantages |
EBV IgM immunoblotting | Useful only in verifying the specificity of EBV IgM | Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation; expensive |
HCMV IgM Parvovirus IgM | Useful in verifying the specificity of EBV IgM | Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation |
EBV IgG immunoblotting | Only useful in verifying the specificity of EBNA-1 IgG | Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation; expensive |
IgG avidity | Useful in distinguishing primary infection (transient) from reactivation | Individual maturation |
Molecular biology | Useful for EBV reactivation follow-up | Difficult to distinguish late primary infection (transient) from reactivation in a single sample; expensive; organisational problems |
Heterophile antibodies | Useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) reactivation when positive; inexpensive and simple | Not very sensitive (especially in children) |
Anti-EA(D) IgG | Useful for EBV reactivation follow-up | Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation in a single sample |
CLIA for EBV antibodies with differential cut-off values | Useful in distinguishing primary infection (transient) from past infection; can be used for screening | Requires further study |
- Citation: De Paschale M, Clerici P. Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Problems and solutions. World J Virol 2012; 1(1): 31-43
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v1/i1/31.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v1.i1.31