Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Transplant. Jun 28, 2018; 8(3): 75-83
Published online Jun 28, 2018. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i3.75
Table 1 Characteristics of retrospective studies
Ref.CountryYearnGroup 1Group 2Study outcome(s)Comments
Ammori et al[5]United States2007184Strict glucose control (BG < 150 mg/dL)Poor Glucose control (BG ≥ 150 mg/dL)Mortality Infection rate
Chung et al[25]South Korea2014211BG decline during the Neohepatic Phase (Yes)BG decline during the Neohepatic Phase (No)Mortality, length of ICU stay, early allograft dysfunction, MELD Score recoveryOutcomes were assessed relative to the drop in hyperglycemia after the neohepatic phase
Gelley et al[21]Hungary2011310De novo diabetesControlHepC recurrence and association with NODAT
Hartog et al[23]United Kingdom2014430DBDDCDNODAT
Keegan et al[17]United States2010161 (158 were available for analysis)Pre-protocolProtocolMortality Morbidity Graft function
Linder et al[18]United States2016114PTDMNon-PTDMPTDMBPAR, allograft failure, death, CMV infection are additional endpoints
Park et al[4]United States/Taiwan2009680SSI (Yes)SSI (No)SSI
Trail et al[20]United States1996497PTDMCase-controlPTDM morbidityPTDM leading to infections and graft rejection
Wallia et al[1]United States2010144BG > 200 mg/dLBG < 200 mg/dLGraft rejection, infection, and re-hospitalizationGraft survival and prolonged ventilation
Wallia et al[19]United States201173Glucose management serviceNon-Glucose Management ServiceGraft rejection, infection, and re-hospitalizationGraft survival and prolonged ventilation
Yoo et al[6]South Korea2016304Normoglycemia (BG: 80-200 mg/dL)Mild hyperglycemia (BG: 200-250 mg/dL)AKIGroup 3: Moderate hyperglycemia (250-300 mg/dL) Group 4: Severe hyperglycemia (> 300 mg/dL)