Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Transplant. Jun 28, 2018; 8(3): 61-67
Published online Jun 28, 2018. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i3.61
Published online Jun 28, 2018. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i3.61
Modality | Examples | Advantages | Limitations |
Pulse wave analysis | LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ | Requires only arterial line; Beat-by-beat CO monitoring (this may help to evaluate response to IV fluids). - Validated by clinical studies in different medical and surgical conditions | Presence of arterial line with optimum waveform signal is a prerequisite; Accuracy may be reduced by sever arrhythmia; Needs frequent recalibration during periods of hemodynamic Instability |
Lithium dilution | LiDCOplus™ | Simple technique (can use peripheral arterial line); Continuous CO monitoring | Arterial line required; Accuracy affected by some neuromuscular blocking drugs; Lithium chloride is contraindicated in patients undergoing treatment with lithium salts |
Electrical bioimpedance | BioZ® | Completely non-invasive | Numerous mathematical assumptions; Limited validity in patients with dysrhythmias |
Partial CO2 rebreathing | NICO™ | Easy to set up | Requires intubation and mechanical ventilation with minimal gas exchange abnormalities and fixed ventilator settings; Accuracy decreased with haemodynamic instability |
Pulsed dye densitometry | DDG-330® | Non-invasive | Intermittent assessment; Accuracy may be affected by vasoconstriction, movement of the sensor and interstitial oedema |
- Citation: Aref A, Zayan T, Sharma A, Halawa A. Utility of central venous pressure measurement in renal transplantation: Is it evidence based? World J Transplant 2018; 8(3): 61-67
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v8/i3/61.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v8.i3.61