Prediction of delayed graft function using different scoring algorithms: A single-center experience

Table 4 Observed prevalence vs predicted probability of delayed graft function in the overall population and by risk group

Kidney graft according to donor type	Observed prevalence of DGF (%)	Probability of DGF predicted by the DGF risk calculator (%) (Irish et al[9])	Probability of DGF predicted by the DGF scoring system (%) (Chapal et al[11])	Probability of DGF predicted by the Jeldres scoring system (%) (Jeldres et al[10])
Overall population (n = 247)	15.3	161	19.71	251
		12-242	13.6-262	14-402
		0.693	0.513	0.543
Standard criteria donor (n = 170)	11.8	141	20.11	211
		10-202	14.5-26.42	13.7-34.22
		0.733	0.603	0.543
Extended criteria donor (n = 42)	19	19.51	21.21	41.51
		14-252	14.4-27.62	25.7-602
		0.393	0.343	0.383
Donation after cardiac death (n = 35)	28.6	301	11.81	211
		18-382	9.1-20.42	8-392
		0.653	0.583	0.643

¹Median;

²P25-P75;

³AUC of the ROC curve. DGF: Delayed graft function.