Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Transplant. Oct 24, 2017; 7(5): 260-268
Published online Oct 24, 2017. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i5.260
Table 1 Comparison of variables used in different scoring systems
DGF risk calculator (Irish et al[9])DGFS scoring system (Chapal et al[11])Jeldres scoring system (Jeldres et al[10])
Recipient variables
Recipient BMI++-
Recipient age+-+
No. of HLA mismatches+-+
Peak PRA (%)+-+
Recipient race+--
Recipient gender+--
Duration of dialysis+--
History of diabetes mellitus+--
Previous transplantation or blood transfusion+--
Single or multiple organ transplant+--
Recipient weight--+
Donor variables
Donor age+++
Duration of CIT+++
Terminal serum creatinine++-
Donor weight+--
Primary cause of death+--
History of hypertension+--
Duration of WIT+--
Type of the donor (living, DCD)+--
Type of induction therapy-+-

  • Citation: Michalak M, Wouters K, Fransen E, Hellemans R, Van Craenenbroeck AH, Couttenye MM, Bracke B, Ysebaert DK, Hartman V, De Greef K, Chapelle T, Roeyen G, Van Beeumen G, Emonds MP, Abramowicz D, Bosmans JL. Prediction of delayed graft function using different scoring algorithms: A single-center experience. World J Transplant 2017; 7(5): 260-268
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v7/i5/260.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v7.i5.260