Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2017; 7(3): 161-178
Published online Jun 24, 2017. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i3.161
Table 4 Selected promising molecules and pathways evaluated as biomarkers in acute rejection[7]
BiomarkerSample (assay method)Patients/samplesRejection/no rejectionSensitivity/specificity (%)PPV/NPV(%)AUC
Granzyme B, perforin and FasL[74]PBL (PCR)25/3111/20100/95100/95NA
FOXP3[88]PBL, urine (PCR)65/7820/5894-100/95/10094-100/95/1000.95-1.00
Granzyme B, perforin[75]Urine (PCR)85/15124/12779-83/77-83NANA
OX40, OX40L, PD-1 and FOXP3[76]Urine (PCR)46/4621/2595/92NA0.98
CD3ε,CXCL10, 18S rRNA[77]Urine (PCR)485/430043/1,7079/78 (71/72)NA0.85 (0.74)
TIM-3[81]PBL, urine (PCR)115/16065/9587-100/95-10087-100/93-1000.96-1.00
CXCL9, CXCL10[78]Urine (multiplex bead assay)156/15625/13180-86/76-80NA0.83-0.87
CXCL9 mRNA and protein[79]PBL, urine (PCR, ELISA, SELDI-TOF-MS280/277037/11366.7-85.2/ 79.6/80.761.5/67.6/83-920.78-0.85
miR-142-5pBiopsy sample (PCR)32/3312/2192-100/90-95NA0.96-0.99
miR-155
miR-223[83]
miR-210[85]Urine (PCR)81/8868/2052/74NA0.7
IFNγ-producing memory T cells[89]PBL (ELISPOT)23/2312/1080/83NA0.8