Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Transplant. Apr 24, 2017; 7(2): 103-116
Published online Apr 24, 2017. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i2.103
Table 2 Papers on the effect of pharmacologic reflux treatment on transplant outcome
Ref.nPopulationTreatment typeAdjunctive treatmentsOutcomes assessed
Yates et al[32], 200520Post-LTx with diagnosis of BOS (n = 18) or potential BOS (n = 2)AZI 250 mg QOD from time of BOS diagnosis to time of manuscript writing (mean 6.25 mo)Immunosuppressive regimen, no additional antireflux agents specifiedEffect on FEV1
Verleden et al[110], 20048Post-LTx with significant decrease in their FEV1 attributed to BOSAZI 250 mg qd × 5 d then 250 mg po QODImmunosuppressive regimen, no additional antireflux agents specifiedEffect on FEV1
Verleden et al[111], 200614Post-LTx with BOSAZI 250 mg po qd × 5 d then AZI 250 mg po 3 × /wk × 3 moImmunosuppressive regimen, no additional antireflux agents specifiedReduction in airway neutrophilia and IL-8 mRNA, effect on FEV1
Mertens et al[112], 200912Post-LTx on AZI with pH monitoringAZI 250 mg PO 3 ×/wkImmunosuppressive regimen, held antireflux treatments × 1 wk prior to testingEffect on impedance-pH monitoring, gastric aspiration via BAL analysis
Blondeau et al[78], 200818Post-LTx on PPI vs off PPI at time of testing (secondary cohort)Omeprazole 20 mg PO BIDImmunosuppressive regimenPrevalence of reflux on objective testing, effect on aspiration in BAL