Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Transplant. Dec 24, 2016; 6(4): 759-766
Published online Dec 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.759
Published online Dec 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.759
Ref. | Patient number | Immunological risk | Timing of CS withdrawal | Induction immunosuppression | Maintenance immunosuppression | Acute rejection (%) | Allograft/patient survival (%) | Follow-up (mo) |
Immunologically high-risk patients | ||||||||
Thomas et al[26] | 11 | PRA > 20%, or | No CS | Alemtuzumab | TAC | 18.2 | 86/100 | 12 |
10 | repeat transplant | Day 5 | ATG | TAC, MMF | 37.5 | 88/88 | ||
Hanaway et al[17] | 164 | PRA > 20%, or | Day 5 | Alemtuzumab | TAC, MMF | 18 | 91/99 | 36 |
171 | black race, or repeat transplant | Day 5 | ATG | 15 | 84/91 | |||
Pediatric patients | ||||||||
Grenda et al[28] | 98 | Low/moderate | Day 4 | Daclizumab | TAC, MMF | 10.2 | 97/99 | 6 |
98 | (PRA < 50%) | Standard CS | No induction | 7.1 | 97/100 | |||
Höcker et al[29] | 23 | Moderate/high (PRA < 80%) | After year 1 | No | CsA, MMF | 4 | 100/100 | 24 |
19 | Standard CS | 10 | 100/100 |
- Citation: Vlachopanos G, Bridson JM, Sharma A, Halawa A. Corticosteroid minimization in renal transplantation: Careful patient selection enables feasibility. World J Transplant 2016; 6(4): 759-766
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v6/i4/759.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.759