Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Transplant. Dec 24, 2016; 6(4): 759-766
Published online Dec 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.759
Published online Dec 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.759
Table 3 Characteristics of major randomized corticosteroid withdrawal trials
Ref. | Patient number | Immunological risk | Timing of CS withdrawal | Induction immunosuppression | Maintenance immunosuppression | Biopsy-proven acute rejection (%) | Allograft/patient survival (%) | Follow-up (mo) |
Vanrenterghem et al[20] | 252 | Low | At month 3 | No | CsA, MMF | 23b | 95/99 | 12 |
248 | Standard CS | 14b | 96/98 | |||||
Smak Gregoor et al[24] | 76 | Low | After month 6 | No | CsA, MMF | 4.0a | 98/97 | 24 |
73 | Standard CS | 1.4 | 97/97 | |||||
Vanrenterghem et al[21] | 279 | Low | After month 3 | No | TAC, MMF | 5.9ad | 93/99 | 6 |
277 | Standard CS | 0.9d | 94/98 |
- Citation: Vlachopanos G, Bridson JM, Sharma A, Halawa A. Corticosteroid minimization in renal transplantation: Careful patient selection enables feasibility. World J Transplant 2016; 6(4): 759-766
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v6/i4/759.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.759