Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2016; 6(2): 321-330
Published online Jun 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.321
Published online Jun 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.321
Ref. | Publication’s year | Therapy | Patients n | ≥VGPR (%) preASCT | ≥VGPR (%) postASCT | ≥PR % | CR/nCR % | PFS/EFS OS |
Thalidomide | ||||||||
Rajkumar et al[32] | 2006 | TD vs D | 200 | 63 vs 41 (≥ PR) | NR | NR | ||
Cavo et al[10] | 2009 | TD vs VAD | 270 | 30 vs 15 | 68 vs 49 | PFS 51% vs 31% at 4 yr | ||
OS 69% vs 53% at 5 yr | ||||||||
Barlogie et al[17] | 2006 | TT2 + Thal vs TT2 | 668 | NR | 62 vs 43 | EFS 56% vs 44% at 3 yr | ||
OS 65% vs 65% at 5 yr | ||||||||
Lokhorst et al[33] | 2010 | TAD vs VAD | 402 | 32 vs 15 | 49 vs 32 | EFS 34 mo vs 22 mo | ||
OS 73 mo vs 60 mo | ||||||||
Lenalidomide | ||||||||
Richardson et al[38] | 2010 | VRD | 35 | 100 | 57 | NR | ||
Palumbo et al[56] | 2014 | 402 | ||||||
MPR | 202 | NR | NR | PFS 22.4 mo vs 43 mo | ||||
vs | ||||||||
HDM | 200 | NR | NR | OS 65.3% vs 81.6% | ||||
Maintenance R | 198 | 78 | 23 | PFS 41.9 mo vs 21.6 mo | ||||
vs | ||||||||
No maintenance | 204 | 77 | 19 | OS 79% vs 88% | ||||
McCarthy et al[66] | 2012 | Lenalidomide vs placebo | 460 | PFS at 3 yr | ||||
66% vs 39% | ||||||||
OS at 3 yr | ||||||||
88% vs 80% | ||||||||
Attal et al[67] | 2012 | Lenalidomide vs placebo | 614 | PFS at 4 yr | ||||
43% vs 22% | ||||||||
OS at 4 y | ||||||||
73% vs 75% | ||||||||
Bortezomib | ||||||||
Harousseau et al[16] | 2010 | ®VD vs VAD | 482 | 38 vs 15 | 54 vs 37 | 36 m vs 27 m | ||
Sonneveld et al[34] | 2012 | ®Induction PAD + maint VEL vs induction VAD + maint Thal | 626 | NR | 75 vs 61 | 46% vs 42% at 3 yr | ||
Cavo et al[13] | 2010 | ®VTD vs TD induction and consolid | 480 | 62 vs 28 | 82 vs 64 | 68% vs 56% at 3 yr | ||
Rosiñol et al[37] | 2012 | ®VTD vs TD | 202 | 29 vs 14 (CR) | 59 vs 40 (CR) | 82% at 2 yr (OS) | ||
Moreau et al[35] | 2011 | ®VD vs vtD | 199 | 49 vs 39 | 74 vs 58 | 30 mo vs 26 mo | ||
Leleu et al[36] | 2013 | VTd-ASCT + consolid VTd vs VTd-ASCT | 217 | After treatment: 83 vs 64 | TTP: 62% vs 29% at 4 yr |
- Citation: Brioli A. First line vs delayed transplantation in myeloma: Certainties and controversies. World J Transplant 2016; 6(2): 321-330
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v6/i2/321.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.321