Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2016; 6(2): 255-271
Published online Jun 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255
Published online Jun 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255
Advantages |
Safety |
Lower rates of urinary tract infections and urologic complications |
More “physiologic”; fewer metabolic and volume problems |
Fewer readmissions |
Technical considerations |
Treats exocrine insufficiency (in patients following total pancreatectomy or in patients with cystic fibrosis |
Avoidance of need for enteric conversion; lower relaparotomy rate |
Can be used with either systemic or portal venous outflow |
Disadvantages |
Safety |
Higher incidence of leakage of pancreatic enzymes, pancreatitis, peri-pancreatic fluid collections |
Higher incidence of intra-abdominal abscess, peritonitis, sepsis |
Anastomotic leaks, GI bleeding |
Increased risk of wound infections, wound healing problems (contaminated case with GI tract breach) |
Technical considerations |
Selective need for enterolysis or diverting Roux en y limb |
Loss of direct access to anastomosis and allograft for diagnosis and treatment |
Miscellaneous problems |
Inability to directly monitor exocrine secretions |
- Citation: El-Hennawy H, Stratta RJ, Smith F. Exocrine drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation in the new millennium. World J Transplant 2016; 6(2): 255-271
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v6/i2/255.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255