Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2016; 6(2): 255-271
Published online Jun 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255
Published online Jun 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255
Advantages |
Safety |
Reduced infection rate because of relative sterility of lower urinary tract |
Control of anastomosis by urethral catheter decompression |
Technical considerations |
Relative simplicity because of favorable anatomic location of bladder |
Bladder mobilization permits tension-free, multi-layer anastomosis |
Bladder vasculature and urothelium promote healing |
Direct access to exocrine secretions for monitoring pancreas allograft function |
Detection of rejection by urinary parameters (amylase, lipase, insulin, cytology) |
Cystoscopic access for either duodenal or pancreatic parenchymal biopsy |
Disadvantages |
Urologic problems |
Hematuria, dysuria, cystitis, urethritis, urethral stricture or disruption, balanitis |
Increased risk of lower urinary tract infections, stone formation, and urine leaks (either from bladder or duodenum) |
Metabolic and volume problems |
Dehydration, orthostasis, constipation, erythrocytosis |
Metabolic acidosis |
Miscellaneous problems |
Reflux-associated hyperamylasemia or pancreatitis |
Transitional cell (urothelial) dysplasia |
Need for enteric conversion for refractory, persistent, or recurrent problems |
Medication burden (massive amounts of bicarbonate supplementation) |
- Citation: El-Hennawy H, Stratta RJ, Smith F. Exocrine drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation in the new millennium. World J Transplant 2016; 6(2): 255-271
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v6/i2/255.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255