Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Transplant. Mar 24, 2016; 6(1): 103-114
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.103
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.103
Pro | Contra |
Annual mortality rate in dialysis patients exceeds 20%[2] | 70% increased risk for graft failure vs SCD kidneys[12] |
Rapidly growing transplant waiting lists and, subsequently, increasingly longer waiting times[1-3] | 17% primary graft non-function vs SCD kidneys[12] |
Survival advantage of ECD kidney transplant recipients over dialysis patients remaining on transplant waiting list[2,4,6,15] | 38% of ECD kidneys were discarded vs 9% for all other kidneys[12] |
Increased treatment cost and resource use[3,4] | |
Mortality in perioperative period greater in ECD kidney recipients[4,13] | |
Higher DGF rates, more acute rejection episodes and decreased long-term graft function in ECD vs SCD kidneys[12-14] |
- Citation: Filiopoulos V, Boletis JN. Renal transplantation with expanded criteria donors: Which is the optimal immunosuppression? World J Transplant 2016; 6(1): 103-114
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v6/i1/103.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.103