Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2015; 5(2): 38-43
Published online Jun 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.38
Published online Jun 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.38
Old kidney allocation system (effective 1988 - 12/3/2014) | New kidney allocation system (effective 12/4/2014 onwards) |
Wait list time starts from time of listing | Wait list time starts from time of listing or date of initiation of dialysis, whichever comes first |
The quality of organs described based on the terms SCD, ECD and DCD kidneys | The quality of organs assessed by a KDPI score (0%-100%) |
No metric was involved in allocating kidneys depending on the expected long- term outcomes of the transplant candidates | Longevity matching is used to allocate kidneys depending on the KDPI and EPTS scores |
Only 4 priority points were given for HLA sensitization for a cPRA ≥ 80% | Gradation of priority points given based on HLA sensitization for cPRA ≥ 20% range from 1-202, which can bring the recipient much higher on the list |
Long wait time for blood group B candidates | In order to decrease wait times for B blood group candidates, A2/A2B blood type donors acceptable |
Pay back system present | Pay back system eliminated |
Priority given to pediatric candidates: share 35 (donor age < 35 yr) | Pediatric candidates still get priority for kidneys with KDPI < 35% |
National and regional sharing for sensitized patients was not mandated | National, regional and local priority sharing of organs for highly sensitized patients with cPRA of 100%, 99% and 98% respectively |
High discard rate existed for marginal ECD/ DCD kidneys | Regional sharing of marginal kidneys (KDPI > 85%) is proposed |
- Citation: Chopra B, Sureshkumar KK. Changing organ allocation policy for kidney transplantation in the United States. World J Transplant 2015; 5(2): 38-43
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v5/i2/38.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.38