Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2014; 4(2): 57-80
Published online Jun 24, 2014. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i2.57
Published online Jun 24, 2014. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i2.57
Ref. | Design | Population (n) | Baseline regimen | n | Strategy | Follow-up | Renal function | Acute rejection | Graft survival | Patient survival |
Gutierrez et al[102] | Cohort | > 1-yr post transplant, chronic allograft dysfunction, no proteinuria | Not specified | 8 | SRL added, CNI dose reduced 50% | 24.6 mo | Proteinuria = +0.56 g/d vs baseline (P = NS) | NA | 90.50% | 85.70% |
13 | SRL added, CNI withdrawn | Proteinuria = + 0.67 g/d vs baseline (P = 0.02) | ||||||||
> 1-yr post transplant, chronic allograft dysfunction, proteinuria = 0.3-0.8 g/d | 10 | SRL added, CNI dose reduced 50% | 23.2 mo | Proteinuria = +0.5 g/d vs baseline (P = NS) | NA | 83.30% | 94.40% | |||
8 | SRL added, CNI withdrawn | Proteinuria = +1.1 g/d vs baseline (P = 0.05) | ||||||||
> 1-yr post transplant, chronic allograft dysfunction, proteinuria > 0.8 g/d | 14 | SRL added, CNI dose reduced 50% | 25.9 mo | Proteinuria = -0.1 g/d vs baseline (NS) | NA | 79.20% | 87.50% | |||
10 | SRL added, CNI withdrawn | Proteinuria = +2.3 g/d vs baseline (P = 0.01) | ||||||||
Maharaj et al[103] | Retrospective cohort | > 1-yr post transplant, CsA-induced biochemical toxicity | Not specified | 6 | SRL added, CNI withdrawn | 25 mo | Proteinuria = +0.06 g/d vs baseline eGFR = +12.2 mL/min vs baseline | NA | NA | NA |
> 1-yr post transplant, CAN | 6 | Proteinuria = +0.85 g/d vs baseline eGFR = -9.7 mL/min vs baseline | NA | NA | NA | |||||
> 1-yr post transplant, Severe gum hypertrophy | 9 | Proteinuria = +0.99 g/d vs baseline eGFR = -1.0 mL/min vs baseline | NA | NA | NA | |||||
4.5 mo post transplant, Posttransplant diabetes | 4 | Proteinuria = -0.22 g/d vs baseline eGFR = +13.3 mL/min vs baseline | NA | NA | NA | |||||
5.5 mo post transplant, CNI induced histological nephrotoxicty | 2 | Proteinuria = +0.63 g/d vs baseline eGFR = -10.0 mL/min vs baseline | NA | NA | NA | |||||
> 1-yr post transplant, CNI associated malignancy | 3 | Proteinuria = +0.09 g/d vs baseline eGFR = +7.0 mL/min vs baseline | NA | NA | NA | |||||
Citterlo et al[104] | Cohort | > 6-mo post transplant, deteriorating renal function, sCr 2-4.5 mg/dL, proteinuria > 500 mg/d, biopsy confirmed fibrosis, tubular atrophy and intimal hyperplasia | CsA or TAC or azathioprine with corticosteroid | 19 | SRL added to target trough 8-12 ng/mL, CNI withdrawn by 3 mo | 6 mo | Response rate: 57% improved or lacked deterioration in renal function | 0% | NA | 100% |
Wu et al[105] | Retrospective cohort | > 1-yr post transplant, CAN | CsA or TAC/corticosteroids orCsA or TAC/corticosteroids/ MMF | 32 | SRL added with CNI dose reduced | 8.5 mo | Response rate: 50% improved or lacked deterioration in renal function | 3.10% | 87.50% | NA |
Chhabra et al[106] | Randomized, prospective, open-label, single-center | > 1-yr post transplant | TAC, MMF | 123 | SRL added to target trough 5-8 ng/mL, TAC withdrawn by week 2 | 41.1 mo | eGFR = -3.3 mL/min per 1.73 m2vs baseline proteinuria > 1 g/d = + 4.7% vs baseline | 5.70% (ACR) 4.1% (AHR) | 97.60% | 97% |
64 | Continue TAC to target trough 6-8 ng/mL | 40.7 mo | eGFR = -8.7 mL/min per 1.73 m2vs baseline, proteinuria > 1 g/d = + 7.4% vs baseline | 6.40% (ACR) 3.1% (AHR) | 97% | 100% | ||||
Wali et al[107] | Cohort | Renal dysfunction and biopsy confirmed CAN | TAC/MMF or TAC/MMF/corticosteroids | 159 | SRL added, target trough 8-10 ng/mL, TAC withdrawn after second dose of SRL | 24 mo | sCr = -1.1 mg/dL vs baseline (P < 0.0001) eGFR = +21 mg/dL vs baseline (P < 0.0001) | 9.60% | 65% | 90% |
Diekmann et al[108] | Cohort | > 1-yr post transplant, biopsy confirmed CNI toxicity | CsA or TAC/corticosteroids, or CsA or TAC/corticosteroids/ azathioprine, or CsA or TAC/corticosteroids/ MMF,or CsA or TAC/MMF, or TAC/MMF/corticosteroids CsA or TAC/azathioprine | 22 | SRL added, target trough 8-12 ng/mL, CsA or TAC reduced by 50% immediately then further reduced 10%-20% weekly | 6 mo | sCr = -0.7 mg/dL vs baseline (%= NS), Response rate: 59.1% improved or lacked deterioration in renal function | NA | 86% | 100% |
Bumbea et al[109] | Prospective, single-center cohort | >6-mo post transplant, chronic allograft dysfunction or recurrent cutaneous cancer | CsA or TAC/corticosteroids, or CsA or TAC/corticosteroids/ azathioprine or CsA or TAC/corticosteroids/ MMF | 43 | SRL added, target trough = 8-12 ng/mL, CNI withdrawn abruptly or by week 3 | 27 mo | sCr = -17.8 μmol/L vs baseline (P = NS) CrCL = +2.3 mL/min vs baseline (P = NS) Proteinuria (> 1g/d): 20.6% at 2 yr (P = 0.01) | 0% | 93% | 95.30% |
Boratynska et al[110] | Cohort | > 1-yr post transplant, biopsy confirmed CAN | CsA, prednisone, azathioprine | 5 | SRL added, target trough 10-18 ng/mL, CsA withdrawn immediately. After 5 mo, SRL withdrawn and CsA reinitiated | 3 mo | sCr = +1.6 mg/dL and proteinuria = +461 mg/dL after 3 mo SRL vs baseline sCr = +1.1 mg/dL and proteinuria = +6 mg/dL 6 mo after reconversion to CsA vs baseline sCr = -0.5 mg/dL and proteinuria = -455 mg/dL after reconversion to CsA vs SRL | 0% | 40% | 100% |
Martínez-Mier et al[111] | Retrospective cohort | > 6-mo post transplant, > 20% sCr increase in 6 mo or sCr 2-4.5 mg/dL | CsA, prednisone, MMF | 15 | SRL added, target trough 8-12 ng/mL, CsA withdrawn immediately | 6 mo | sCr = -0.78 mg/dL vs baseline (P = 0.003) BUN = - 9.84 mg/dL vs baseline (P = NS) | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Kamar et al[112] | Prospective, multicenter, noncomparative, open-label cohort | > 1-yr post transplant, moderate renal insufficiency, sCr 160-265 µmol/L | CsA or TAC, corticosteroids, MMF | 44 | SRL added to target trough 6-10 ng/mL, CNI withdrawn | 6 mo | GFR = +7.09 mL/min vs baseline (P = 0.03) Proteinuria = +0.57 g/d | 2.30% | 100% | 100% |
Chen et al[113] | Cohort | > 6-mo post transplant, biopsy confirmed CAN | CsA or TAC, prednisone, MMF | 16 | SRL added, target trough 5-8 ng/mL, CNI withdrawn | 12 mo | Response rate: 43.8% improved or lacked deterioration in renal function | 0% | 88% | 100% |
Stallone et al[114] | Prospective, open-label, single-center | > 1-yr post transplant, Scr 1-3 mg/dL | CsA or TAC, corticosteroids, MMF | 50 | 40% CNI dose reduction | 24 mo | sCr = -0.02 mg/dL vs baseline (P = NS) CrCL -3.0 mL/min vs baseline (P = NS) Proteinuria = +0.17 vs baseline (P = NS) Follow-up biopsy: worsened CAN score, increased α-SMA | 0% | 84% | 100% |
34 | SRL added, CNI immediately withdrawn | sCr = -0.14 mg/dL vs baseline (P = NS) CrCL = +3.0 mg/dL vs baseline (P = NS) Proteinuria = +0.37 g/d vs baseline (P = NS) Follow-up biopsy: stable CAN score, improved α-SMA | 0% | 97% (P = 0.04) | 100% | |||||
Paoletti et al[115] | Cohort | > 6-mo post transplant, biopsy confirmed renal allograft dysfunction | CsA or TAC, corticosteroids, MMF | 13 | SRL added, target trough 4-8 ng/mL, CNI withdrawn | 3 yr | sCr = -0.3 mg/dL vs baseline (P = 0.016) eGFR = +5.5 mg/dL vs baseline (P = 0.011) Proteinuria = +0.21 g/d vs baseline (P = 0.83) | 8% | 100% | 100% |
> 6-mo post transplant with stable graft function | 26 | Continued regimen | sCr= +0.3 mg/dL vs baseline (P = 0.016) eGFR = -6.4 mg/dL vs baseline (P = 0.011) Proteinuria = +0.17 g/d vs baseline (P = 0.83) | 4% | 96% | 96% | ||||
Alarrayed et al[116] | Retrospective, Observational, single-center | > 1-yr post transplant, sCr < 140 µmol/L | CsA or TAC, corticosteroids, azathioprine or MMF | 45 | SRL added to target trough 5-8 ng/mL, CNI withdrawn immediately | 72.8 mo | sCr = -6 μmol/L vs baseline (P = 0.001) Proteinuria = +0.2 g/d vs baseline (P = NS) | 0% | 100% | NA |
> 1-yr post transplant, sCr ≥ 140 µmol/L | 19 | sCr = -13 µmol/L vs baseline (P = 0.01) Proteinuria = +0.6 g/d vs baseline (P = 0.001) | 36.40% | 72.70% | NA | |||||
Fischereder et al[117] | Prospective cohort | > 1-yr post transplant, deteriorating renal function, Scr 1.8-4 mg/dL | CsA or TAC, corticosteroids, azathioprine or MMF | 12 | SRL added, target trough = 10-20 ng/mL, CNI withheld by 4 wk | 12 mo | sCr = -0.3 mg/dL vs baseline (P = 0.198) CrCL = +5.8 mL/min (P = 0.0368) Proteinuria = +735 mg/g creatinine vs baseline (P = 0.13) | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Schena et al[118] | Randomized, prospective, open-label, multicenter, blinded, comparative trial | > 6-mo post transplant, baseline GFR > 40 mL/min | CsA or TAC, corticosteroids, azathioprine or MMF | 497 | SRL added, target trough 8-20 ng/mL, CNI withdrawn in 1 d, MMF or azathioprine dose reduced or withdrawn | 24 mo | GFR = + 1.3 mL/min in patients converted to SRL as compared with patients continued on CNI at 12 mo (P = NS) GFR = +1.3 mL/min vs baseline, UPr/Cr = -84 vs baseline | 7.80% | 92.40% | 95.60% |
> 6-mo post transplant, baseline GFR 20-40 mL/min | 58 | GFR = + 3.8 mL/min in patients converted to SRL as compared with patients continued on CNI at 24 mo (P = NS) | 8.60% | 65.50% | 82.80% | |||||
> 6-mo post transplant, baseline GFR > 40 mL/min | 246 | Continue regimen | GFR = -1.8 mL/min vs baseline, UPr/Cr = -31 vs baseline | 6.50% | 93.90% | 96.30% | ||||
> 6-mo post transplant, baseline GFR 20-40 mL/min | 29 | GFR = + 2.6 mL/min in patients continued on CNI as compared with patients converted to SRL at 12 mo (P = NS) | 10.30% | 62.10% | 89.70% |
- Citation: Mathis AS, Egloff G, Ghin HL. Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies. World J Transplant 2014; 4(2): 57-80
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v4/i2/57.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v4.i2.57