Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Transplant. Mar 24, 2014; 4(1): 18-29
Published online Mar 24, 2014. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i1.18
Table 2 Historical clinical reports in ABO incompatible kidney transplantation
Ref.Type of studyStudy populationABOi populationDesensitizationOutcome
Hume et al[18]Observational91No treatmentGraft nephrectomy day 17
Starzl et al[19]Observational32SPx (1 case)Graft survival 74 d (1 case), patient death day 24 (1 case)
Sheil et al[20]Observational22No treatmentGraft nephrectomy day 14
Alexandre et al[11]Observational2323PE/SPx2-yr graft survival: 88% (related donor), 50% (unrelated donor)
Ota et al[21]Observational, comparative5151DFPP and/or IAs/SPx2-yr graft survival: 87% vs 84.6% vs 50% ( A- vs B- vs ABO-incompatible)
Tanabe et al[22]Observational, comparative43367DFPP and IAs/SPx8-yr graft survival: 73% vs 80 % (ABOi vs ABOc)
Ishida et al[23]Observational9393DFPP/SPx5-yr graft survival: 73%
Ohta et al[24]Observational, pediatric1010DFPP or PE or IAs/SPx5.4-yr graft survival: 100%
Shishido et al[25]Observational, pediatric1616PE and IAs/SPx5-yr graft survival: 85%
Takahashi et al[2]Observational, comparative1496441DFPP or PE or IAs/SPx9-yr graft survival: 59% vs 57% (ABOi vs ABOc)
Shimmura et al[26]Observational, comparative167167DFPP and/or IAs/SPx5-yr graft survival: 74.3% vs 78.5% ( CYA with AZ or MZ vs TAC or MMF)
Futagawa et al[27]Observational, comparative37803191NA5-yr graft survival: 66.2% vs 79.5% (ABOi vs ABOc)
Ishida et al[28]Observational, comparative222222DFPP/SPx5-yr graft survival: 73% vs 90% ( CYA with AZ vs TAC with MMF)
Tyden et al[29]Observational, comparative33460IAs/RIT/IVIGGraft survival: ABOi 97% (1.5-yr) vs ABOc 95% (1.8-yr)
Galliford et al[30]Observational1010PE/RIT/IVIG1-yr graft survival: 100%
Genberg et al[31]Observational, comparative4515IAs/RIT/IVIGGraft survival: ABOi 86.7% (3.4-yr) vs ABOc 86.7% (4.0-yr)
Oettl et al[32]Observational1010IAs/RIT/IVIG1.3-yr graft survival: 100%
Toki et al[33]Observational, comparative5757DFPP/SPx8-yr graft survival: 49% vs 95% (AAMR vs non-AAMR)
Wilpert et al[34]Observational, comparative8340IAs/RIT/IVIGGraft survival: ABOi 100% (3.3-yr) vs ABOc 93% (1.5-yr)
Tyden et al[1]Observational, comparative, pediatric3810IAs/RIT/IVIGGraft loss within 3 years: ABOi 1 case, ABOc 2 cases
Flint et al[35]Observational, comparative8937PE/IVIG1-yr graft survival: 100% (ABOi vs ABOc)
Fichinoue et al[36]Observational, comparative393113DFPP or PE/SPx or RIT5-yr graft survival: 88.4% vs 90.3% vs 100% (ABOc vs ABOi-SPx vs ABOi-RIT)
Habicht et al[37]Observational, comparative6821IAs/RIT/IVIG1-yr graft survival : 100% (ABOi vs ABOc)
Lipshutz et al[38]Observational1818PE/RIT/IVIG1-yr graft survival: 94.4%
Shirakawa et al[39]Observational, comparative7474DFPP/RIT1-yr graft survival: 95.7% vs 98.% ( RIT 500mg vs RIT 200 mg)
Shishido et al[3]Observational, comparative, pediatric32352PE/SPx or RIT15-yr graft survival: 86% vs 78% (ABOi vs ABOc)
Montgomery et al[4]Observational, comparative78193738NA10-yr cumulative incidence of graft loss: 27.1% vs 23.9% (ABOi vs ABOc)
Morath et al[40]Observational, comparative1919IAs or IAns/RIT/IVIG1-yr graft survival: 100% (IAs vs IAns)
Uchida et al[41]Observational2525DFPP or PE/SPx or RIT4.5-yr graft survival: 100%
Ashimine et al[42]Observational, comparative32092DFPP/SPx or RIT or none5-yr graft survival: 87% vs 97.7% (ABOi vs ABOc)