Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Transplant. Dec 24, 2013; 3(4): 99-112
Published online Dec 24, 2013. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v3.i4.99
Published online Dec 24, 2013. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v3.i4.99
Ref. | No.ofpatients | Age of patients (yr) | Underlying diseases | Conditioning | Overall survival (BM vs PBSC) | Disease-free survival (BM vs PBSC) | Relapse (BM vs PBSC) | Transplant-related mortality (BM vs PBSC) | Acute graft-versus host disease (BM vs PBSC) | Chronic graft-versus host disease (BM vs PBSC) | Median time of neutrophil engraftment (d) (BM vs PBSC) | Median time of platelet engraftment (d) (BM vs PBSC) |
[23,29] | 56 | 7-59 | Acute leukemias, CML, MDS, MM, NHL | Myeloablative1 | 48% vs 56%2 (2000 d) | 50 vs 60%2 (2000 d) | NA | NA | 23% vs 26%2 (grades 2-4) | 61% vs 77%2 (extensive cGVHD) | 18 vs 15a | 18 vs 12b |
[9] | 39 | 22-51 | Acute leukemias, CML, CLL, MDS, MM, NHL | Myeloablative1 | 63% vs 70%2 (2 yr) | NA | 37% vs 0%a (2 yr) | 32% vs 35%2 | 58% vs 68%2 (grades 1-4) | 40% vs 44%2 (All cGVHD) | 23 vs 17.5b | 18 vs 11d |
[25] | 61 | 15-62 | Acute leukemias, CML, MDS, PMF | Bu/Cy | 73% vs 80%2 (4 yr) | 55% vs 80%2 (4 yr) | 30% vs 3%2 | 10% vs 17%2 | 10% vs 21%2 (grades 2-4) | 27% vs 56%2 (All cGVHD) | 23 vs 17d | 21 vs 13d |
[10,19] | 101 | Mean 37 | Acute leukemias, CML | Myeloablative1 | 65% vs 67%2 (2 yr) | 66% vs 67%2 (2 yr) | 15% vs 6%2 | 21% vs 25%2 | 42% vs 44%2 (grades 2-4) | 36% vs 65%b (All cGVHD) 17% vs 44%b (extensive cGVHD) | 21 vs 153 | 21 vs 13d |
[15-18] | 329 | 19-58 | Acute leukemias, CML, MDS | Myeloablative1 | 65% vs 65%2 (2 yr) 65% vs 58%2 (3 yr) 57% vs 49%2 (10 yr) | 60% vs 56%2 (3 yr) 46% vs 42%2 (10 yr) | 24% vs 20%2 (10 yr) | 32% vs 24%2 | 42% vs 44%a (grades 2-4) | 56% vs 74%b (All cGVHD) 19% vs 36%b (extensive cGVHD) | 15 vs 12d | 20 vs 15d |
[12,13,20] | 172 | 12-55 | Acute leukemias, CML, CLL, MDS, MM, lymphomas | Myeloablative1 | 54% vs 66%2 (2 yr) 52% vs 55%2 (10 yr) | 45% vs 65%a (2 yr) 40% vs 50%a (10 yr) | 25% vs 14%a (2 yr) 32% vs 20%a (10 yr) | 30% vs 21%2 | 57% vs 64%2 (grades 2-4) | 52% vs 63%2 (extensive cGVHD) | 21 vs 16d | 19 vs 13d |
[11] | 227 | 19-64 | AML, CML, MDS | Bu/Cy | 60% vs 68%a (30 mo) | NA | 9% vs 9%2 | 32% vs 21%2 | 44% vs 44%2 (grades 2-4) | 69% vs 85%2 (All cGVHD) 30% vs 40%2 (extensive cGVHD) | 23 vs 19d | 22 vs 16d |
[30] | 110 | 15-62 | Acute leukemias, MDS, MM, lymphomas | Myeloablative1 | 60% vs 34%a (4 yr) | NA | 13% vs 18%2 | 28% vs 41%2 | 37% vs 52%2 (grades 2-4) | 45% vs 61%2 (All cGVHD) 16% vs 28%2 (extensive cGVHD) | 20 vs 15d | 38 vs 25d |
[14] | 72 | 18-61 | CML | Myeloablative1 | 72% vs 81%2 (3 yr) | 65% vs 81%2 (3 yr) | 15% vs 0%a (3 yr) | 20% vs 19%2 | 49% vs 55%2 (grades 2-4) | 50% vs 59%2 (extensive cGVHD) | 22 vs 17a | 21 vs 142 |
- Citation: Cheuk DK. Optimal stem cell source for allogeneic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies. World J Transplant 2013; 3(4): 99-112
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v3/i4/99.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v3.i4.99