Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Transplant. Jun 18, 2025; 15(2): 99170
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i2.99170
Table 4 Comparative analysis of L-GrAFT7, recipient and normothermic machine perfusion pump parameters across machine perfusion time groups, n (%)
Recipient and graft descriptors
< 8 hours (n = 12)
8-16 hours (n = 27)
16-24 hours (n = 10)
P value
LOS (days)10 (6-42)9 (6-24)8 (6-38)0.363
ICU LOS (days)3.92 (2.21-25.47)3.16 (0.16-9.15)3.12 (0.71-8.08)0.428
ICU readmission0 (0)2 (7.4)4 (40)0.009
Age (years)62.5 (48-72)57 (33-68)59 (43-70)0.227
Transplant model for end-stage liver disease26.5 (13-39)25 (7-34)24 (7-30)0.890
Machine perfusion time (minutes)337 (223-458)722 (510-920)1154 (995-1446)0.001
L-GrAFT73.9 (1.9-20.1)5.5 (2-42.8)4.8 (2.1-44.0)0.312
Early allograft dysfunction1 (8.33)2 (7.41)1 (8.33)0.992
Donor risk index1.62 (1.38-2.03)1.63 (1.28-2.74)1.71 (1.34-2.49)0.670
Cold ischemia time (minutes)135 (80-219)153.5 (45-210)140.5 (94-241)0.719
Warm ischemia time (minutes)28 (18-110)29 (19-132)29.5 (8-110)0.970