Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2025; 15(1): 99220
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i1.99220
Table 3 Main updates in the nomenclature and classification of antibody-mediated rejection in the Banff classification (1991 to 2019)
Banff meetings, years
Category 2 Antibody-mediated rejection1
Basis of diagnosis and classification
Banff ‘93Hyperacute rejectionClinical criteria only
Banff ‘97Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)
    Hyperacute
    Accelerated acute
Banff ’97 update (2001)Diagnostic criteria for acute antibody-mediated rejection were developedHistological criteria
Three types were described as: Types I. ATN-like; II. Capillary; III. ArterialImmunohistopathological criteria
Serological criteria
Banff ‘05Diagnostic criteria for chronic antibody-mediated rejection were developed
Banff ‘07Antibody-mediated changes2
    C4d deposition without rejection
    Acute antibody-mediated rejection
    Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection
Banff ‘13Antibody-mediated changes
    Acute/active antibody-mediated rejectionHistological
    Chronic active antibody-mediated rejectionImmunohistopathological
    C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejectionSerological
Banff ‘15Antibody-mediated changesMolecular criteria
    Acute/active antibody-mediated rejection
    Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection
    C4d staining without evidence of rejection
    Transplant arteriopathy may be seen in chronic
    AMR
Banff ‘17Antibody-mediated changes
    Active AMR
    Chronic active AMR
    C4d staining without evidence of rejection
    3 criteria for AMR diagnosis remain but C4d
    can substitute for DSA
    DSA testing still advised
    Suspicious for AMR eliminated
Banff ‘19Category 2: Antibody-mediated changesHistological
Active ABMRImmunohistopathological
Chronic active ABMRSerological
Chronic (inactive) ABMRMolecular criteria
C4d staining without evidence of rejectionElectron microscopy