Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2025; 15(1): 98003
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i1.98003
Table 2 Summary of the main characteristics of the studies
Ref.
Patients
Intervention/control
Microorganisms studied
Incidence of antimicrobial resistance
Adverse events
Rock et al[12]1085Routine and discharge patient room cleaning using ultraviolet-C light vs routine and discharge patient room cleaningVancomycin-resistant enterococci and Clostridioides difficile6.52 vs 6.68 per 1000 patient-days in vancomycin-resistant enterococci (P > 0.05) and 3.78 vs 2.64 per 1000 patient-days in Clostridioides difficile infections (P > 0.05)Not reported
Avery et al[13]352Maribavir 400 mg twice daily versus valganciclovir/ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovirCytomegalovirus44.4% vs 76.1% (P < 0.05)40 deaths, dysgeusia, nausea, diarrhea
Fariñas et al[14]105Colistin-neomycin vs no treatmentMultidrug-resistant (Enterobacterales)9.4% vs 13.5% (P > 0.05)Diarrhea
Papanicolaou et al[15]120Maribavir 400, 800, or 1200 mg at a ratio of 1:1:1Cytomegalovirus30%, 37.5%, 27.5% (P > 0.05)32 deaths, dysgeusia, nausea
Boivin et al[16]275Ganciclovir vs valganciclovirCytomegalovirus2.3% vs 3.6% (P > 0.05)2 deaths, gastrointestinal problem
Boivin et al[17]80Valganciclovir vs ganciclovirCytomegalovirus2.5% vs 2.5% (P > 0.05)1 death, 23 grafts rejected, abdominal pain, diarrhea
Boivin et al[18]301Valganciclovir vs ganciclovirCytomegalovirus0% vs 6.1% (P < 0.05)1 graft rejected