Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2024; 14(1): 89674
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.89674
Table 3 Summary of the studies included in the systematic literature review focusing on peripheral blood stem cells (i.e., HSC)
Ref.Phase of clinical trialPatients (n)Localization of injuryPre-treatment AIS classification or level of injuryStem cells
Treatment
Follow up (months)Outcomes
Origin
Type
Dose
Administration route
Time from Injury
Functional improvement
Adverse effects
Deda et al[60], 2008N/A9Cervical (6) and thoracic (3)AIS A: 9Autologous peripheral bloodHSC5 × 106IntrathecalChronic (6-51 months)12AIS A→B: 2, AIS A→C: 7No serious adverse effects
Hammadi et al[61], 2012N/A277Cervical (69) and thoracic (208)N/AAutologous peripheral bloodHSC1-8 × 108IntrathecalChronic (6-104 months, average 34.5)24AIS A→B: 88, AIS A→C: 32, AIS = 157. A subgroup (12 patients) with lesion < 12 months had the best outcome: the percentage improvement reached 50%No serious adverse effects. Backache and meningism (90%)
Al-Zoubi et al[62], 2014N/A19ThoracicAIS AAutologous peripheral bloodHSC7.6 × 107IntrathecalChronic (12-48 months)60AIS A→B: 7. AIS A→C: 2, AIS =: 10No serious adverse effects
Bryukhovetskiy et al[63], 2015I/II202Cervical (98), thoracic (93) and lumbar (11)N/AAutologous peripheral bloodHSC5.8 × 106IntrathecalChronic (> 12 months)144Restoration of neurologic deficit (54.7%); Repair of the urinary system (47.7%). ASIA score improvement in 23 casesNo serious adverse effects