Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Transplant. Sep 18, 2023; 13(5): 221-238
Published online Sep 18, 2023. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i5.221
Table 3 Main changes in the nomenclature and classification of antibody-mediated rejection in the Banff classification over three decades of evolution (1991 to 2019)
Meeting reports, year
Category 2: Antibody-mediated rejection1
Banff, 1993Hyperacute rejection
Banff, 1997AMR3
    Hyperacute
    Accelerated acute3
Banff, 1997 update (2001)Diagnostic criteria for acute antibody-mediated rejection were developed. Three types were described as: (1) Types I: ATN-like3; (2) Types II: Capillary3; and (3) Type III: Arterial3
Banff, 2005Diagnostic criteria for chronic antibody-mediated rejection were developed
Banff, 2007Antibody-mediated changes2,3
    C4d deposition without rejection3
    Acute antibody-mediated rejection
    Chronic active3 antibody-mediated rejection
Banff, 2013Antibody-mediated changes
    Acute/active antibody-mediated rejection
    Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection
    C4d-negative antibody3-mediated rejection
Banff, 2015Antibody-mediated changes
    Acute/active3 antibody-mediated rejection
    Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection
    C4d staining without evidence of rejection
    Transplant arteriopathy may be seen in chronic AMR
Banff, 2017Antibody-mediated changes
    Active3 AMR
    Chronic active AMR
    C4d staining without evidence of rejection
    3 criteria for AMR diagnosis remain but C4d can substitute for DSA
    DSA testing still advised
    Suspicious for AMR eliminated
Banff, 2019Category 2: Antibody-mediated changes
    Active AMR
    Chronic active AMR
    Chronic (inactive) AMR3
    C4d staining without evidence of rejection