Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Transplant. Jul 18, 2021; 11(7): 263-276
Published online Jul 18, 2021. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i7.263
Published online Jul 18, 2021. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i7.263
Diagnostic instrument | Factors | Aim | No. of items | Score range | Ref. |
Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation | 4: Social support, psychological health, lifestyle factors, and understanding of transplant and follow-up | To stratify psychosocial risk in solid organ transplant recipients | 8 | 8-40 | Olbrisch et al[19], 1989 |
Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale | Not divided into factors | To assess the reliability and validity of the selection of transplant candidates | 10 | 26.6-79.5 | Twillman et al[20], 1993 |
Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation | 4: Patients’ level of readiness and illness management; level of readiness of patients’ social support system; psychological stability and psychopathology; and lifestyle and substance use | To assess the psychosocial variables and behaviors that frequently have negative effects on all types of transplant candidates | 18 | 0-115 | Maldonado et al[21], 2015 |
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-version 4 | 4: Physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being | To measure dimensions of health-related quality of life in cancer patients | 27 | 0-108 | Cella et al[22], 1993 |
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT)–version 4 | 5: Physical, functional, emotional and social well-being, and BMT-specific complaints | To evaluate multidimensional aspects of quality of life in BMT patients | 27 (FACT) +23 (BMT specific) | 0-200 | McQuellon et al[23], 1997 |
- Citation: Janicsák H, Ungvari GS, Gazdag G. Psychosocial aspects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. World J Transplant 2021; 11(7): 263-276
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v11/i7/263.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v11.i7.263