Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Transplant. Sep 18, 2020; 10(9): 230-255
Published online Sep 18, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i9.230
Table 7 Summary of biomarkers associated with delayed graft function
Ref.nSampleBiomarkersOutcomeStudy conclusion
Parikh et al[46], 2016671PerfusateNGAL, IL-18, L-FABPDGFBase (NGAL) was significantly ↑ in allografts with DGFa. This was also observed in post values of IL-18a and base/post perfusate L-FABP levelsb. These biomarkers did not significantly correlate with DGF development on multivariate adjustment
van Smaalen et al[49], 2017390PerfusateExtracellular histone concentrationDGFExtracellular histone concentration was significantly ↑ in the DGF group (median 0.70 µg/mL (IQR 0.4 to 0.98) compared to grafts that functioned immediatelyc (median, 0.42 (IQR 0.07 to 0.78). Interestingly there was no significant difference in extracellular histone concentration in grafts with primary non-function vs DGF
van Balkom et al[57], 201740PerfusateLeptin, GM-CSF, periostin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, osteopontinDGF5 perfusate proteins/158 tested predicted DGF. Leptin and GM-CSF -> most predictive. Validation with 40 kidneys found that leptin, GM-CSF + BMI predict DGF (AUC = 0.89 (95%CI: 0.74 to 1.00), which performed better than KDRI and DGF risk calculator (AUC 0.55, 0.59)
Roest et al[58], 201948PerfusatemicroRNA mir-505-3pDGFIn 8 DCD and DBD donors, ↑ levels of perfusate microRNA mir-505-3p correlated with DGFb (OR 1.12). This was confirmed via validation of 40 allografts, of which 20 developed DGFb. Interestingly, this predictive capability held true solely for DCD allograftsc
Truche et al[59], 201941Urine and PlasmauNGAL, uNAG, LDH, UCrDGFDGF -UNGAL, UNAG AUC 1, 0.96 (0.84-1.0) , urinary tubular injury biomarker-to-creatinine ratio, and LDH AUC = 1 and 0.92 (95%CI: 0.73 to 1.0)
Pianta et al[60], 201581UrineUrinary clusterin, IL-18, KIM-1, NGALDGFUrinary clusterin predicted DGF at 4 h (AUC = 0.72 (95%CI: 0.57 to 0.97), as did IL-18 , KIM-1 and NGAL; eGFR at 90 d was inversely correlated with urinary clusterin at 12 hb (Pearson r = −0.26, and 7 db (Pearson r = −0.25)
Reese et al[61], 20161304UrineMicroalbumin, NGAL, KIM-1, IL-18, L-FABPAKI, DGF, 6-month eGFRMicroalbumin, NGAL, KIM-1, IL-18, L-FABP from deceased donors at procurement; predictive of AKI; NGAL associated with DGF (RR = 1.21 (95%CI: 1.02 to 1.43), NGAL and L-FABP associated with lower 6 mo eGFR
Nielsen et al[62], 2019225Plasma and urinepNGAL, uNGAL uL-FABP, urine cystatin C, urine YLK-40DGF, 1 yr mGFR/eGFRpNGAL 1 d after tx -> associated with DGF. Did not correlate to 12-mo eGFR; no relation w L-FABP, cystatin C, and YLK-40
Koo et al[63], 201694UrineMicroalbumin, NGAL, KIM-1, IL-18, L-FABPDGF, 1 yr graft functionNGAL predicts AKI; NGAL + L-FABP predicts DGF (AUC 0.758, 0.704); NGAL + L-FABP + Cr better than DGF calculator and KDPI. L-FABP predictive of 1 yr graft functionb
Li et al[64], 20191036Urine and plasmauNGAL, pNGALDGFComposite AUC for 24 hours uNGAL was 0.91 (95%CI: 0.89 to 0.94) and the overall DOR for 24 hours uNGAL was 24.17; sensitivity 0.88, specificity 0.81. The composite AUC for 24 hours pNGAL was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.93 to 0.97) with an overall DOR for 24 hours pNGAL = 43.11 with sensitivity 0.91 and specificity 0.86
Bank et al[65], 201974 (DCD KTRs)UrineUrinary TIMP-2DGFTIMP-2/mOsm on day-1 and day-10 identified patients with DGF (AUC = 0.91) and prolonged DGF (AUC = 0.80); Consecutive TIMP-2/mOsm values showed a ↓ in TIMP-2/mOsm before an ↑estimated glomerular filtration rate, predicting resolution of fDGF
McGuinness et al[66], 201694hsa-miR-217; hsa-miR-125bDGFmiRNA + donor age + type donation predicted DGF in 83% of cases (61% sensitivity, 91% specificity)
Ledeganck et al[21], 201911 studiesAllograft biopsymicroRNADGFUpregulation of miR-21-3P and miR-182-5p associated with DGF