Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Transplant. Sep 18, 2020; 10(9): 230-255
Published online Sep 18, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i9.230
Published online Sep 18, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i9.230
Ref. | n | Sample | Biomarkers | Outcome | Study conclusion |
Oellerich et al[35], 2019 | 189 | Plasma | dd-cfDNA | Rejection | In pts with BPR, dd-cfDNA(cp/mL) was 3.3x and dd-cfDNA(%) 2.0x higher (82 cp/mL; 0.57%) than in stable pts w/o rejection (25 cp/mL; 0.29%). dd-cfDNA abs number > dd-cfDNA % (AUC = 0.73). OR = 7.31 for dd-cfDNA (cp/mL) |
Stites et al[36], 2020 | 79 KTRs with TCMR 1A/borderline rejection | Plasma | dd-cfDNA | eGFR, dnDSA, Future rejection | ↑dd-cfDNA predict adverse outcomes: Among patients with ↑dd-cfDNAa, eGFR ↓ by 8.5% vs 0% in ↓dd-cfDNA pts. dnDSA seen in 40% (17/42) vs |
Bloom et al[38], 2017 | 102 | Plasma | dd-cfDNA | Rejection | Distinguished any rejection from non-rejection along with ABMR from non-ABMR |
Huang et al[40], 2019 | 63 | Plasma | dd-cfDNA | ABMR | dd-cfDNA discriminated ABMRc [median 1.35%; interquartile range (IQR): 1.10%-1.90%] from no rejection (median 0.38%, IQR: 0.26%-1.10%). dd-cfDNA did not distinguish TCMR from no rejection |
Whitlam et al[41], 2019 | 61 | Plasma | dd-cfDNA | aABMR cABMR | gd-cfDNA and fraction were predictive of aAMR (AUC = 0.92, 0.85) and composite dx of ABMR (AUC = 0.91, 0.89). gd-cfDNA w/ modest sensitivity (0.90; 0.85) and specificity (0.88, 0.79) for aAMR and ABMR |
- Citation: Swanson KJ, Aziz F, Garg N, Mohamed M, Mandelbrot D, Djamali A, Parajuli S. Role of novel biomarkers in kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2020; 10(9): 230-255
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v10/i9/230.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v10.i9.230