Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Transplant. Sep 18, 2020; 10(9): 230-255
Published online Sep 18, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i9.230
Published online Sep 18, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i9.230
Ref. | n | Sample | Biomarkers | Outcome | Study conclusion |
Matz et al[17], 2016 | 160 | Plasma | miR-15B, miR-103A, miR-106A | TCMR | miR-15Ba,b, miR-103Aa,b and miR-106Aa,b discriminated patients with stable graft function from patients with TCMR and UTI |
Matz et al[18], 2018 | 111 | Plasma | miR-223-3p; miR-424-3p; miR-145-5p; miR-15b-5p | ABMR, TCMR, IFTA | miR-223-3p, miR-424-3p and miR-145-5p distinguished TCMR and ABMR from stable graft function; mir-145-5P decreased in IFTA (AUC 0.891) compared to stable graft function |
Millán et al[19], 2017 | 80 | Urine | miR-142-3p, miR-210-3p and miR-155-5p, CXCL10 | Rejection | ↑miR-142-3p, ↑miR-155-5p, ↑CXCL10 + ↓miR-210-3p (AUC = 0.875) and CXCL10 (AUC = 0.865) discriminate rejectors and nonrejectors (sensitivity 85%, 84% and specificity 86% and 80% respectively) |
Halloran et al[20], 2017 | 519 | Allograft biopsy | Molecular Microscope® Diagnostic System (MMDx™)/microRNA | TCMR, ABMR | Agreement between MMDx™ and histology = 77% for TCMR, 77% for ABMR, and 76% for no rejection with blinding to histology, HLA. MMDx™c agreed with clinical judgment (87%) more than histology (80%) |
Ledeganck et al[21], 2019 | 11 studies | Allograft biopsy | microRNA | TCMR, ABMR, cABMR | ↑miR-142, miR-155, miR-223 and ↓miR-125, miR-30, miR-204 predict TCMR, ABMR, cABMR |
Lorenzen et al[23], 2015 | 93 | Urine | lcRNA; RP11-354P17.15-001 (L328) | TCMR | RP11-354P17.15-001d (L328) was associated with acute TCMR (AUC = 0.76) sensitivity 49%, specificity 95%; L328 can detect subclinical TCMR |
- Citation: Swanson KJ, Aziz F, Garg N, Mohamed M, Mandelbrot D, Djamali A, Parajuli S. Role of novel biomarkers in kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2020; 10(9): 230-255
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v10/i9/230.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v10.i9.230