Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Transplant. Sep 18, 2020; 10(9): 230-255
Published online Sep 18, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i9.230
Table 12 Summary of biomarkers associated with graft survival and/or patient survival
Ref.nSampleBiomarkersDysfunctionStudy conclusion
de Holanda et al[16], 201873PlasmasCD30Rejection; Graft survivalsCD30 at +7, +14 associated with ARa. No difference in 5 yr graft survival
Koo et al[63], 201694Urinemicroalbumin, NGAL, KIM-1, IL-18, L-FABPDGF, slow graft function , 1 yr graft functionNGAL predicts AKI; NGAL + L-FABP predicts DGF, slow graft function (AUC 0.758, 0.704); NGAL + L-FABP + Cr better than DGF calculator and KDPI. L-FABP predictive of 1 yr graft functionb
Foster et al[68], 2017508Urine and plasmaCystatin C, B2M, CrCV events, Mortality, Kidney failureHR eGFRcys and HR eGFRB2M < 30 vs 60+ were 2.02c (1.09-3.76) and 2.56d (1.35-4.88) for CV events; 3.92e (2.11-7.31) and 4.09d (2.21-7.54) for mortality; and 9.49e (4.28-21.00) and 15.53d (6.99-34.51) for kidney failure
Bansal et al[69], 20161027UrineuNGAL, KIM-1, IL-18, L-FABP, UcrCV events, Graft failure, mortalityEach ↑ log in uNGAL/Cr associated with a 24% ↑ risk of CV events (aHR 1.24; 1.06 to 1.45), graft failure (1.40; 1.16 to 1.68), and risk of death (1.44; 1.26 to 1.65). uKIM-1/Cr and IL-18/Cr associated with higher risk of death (1.29; 1.03 to 1.61 and 1.25;1.04 to 1.49 per log increase)
O’Connell et al[89], 2016204BiopsyGene set of 13 genesIFTA, Graft loss at 2/3 yrGene set prediction > clinicopathologic variables (AUC 0.967 > AUC 0.706, AUC 0.806) for IFTA; predicted graft loss at 2 and 3 years (AUC 0.842, 0.844), validated in 2 public datasets
Ix et al[90], 2017748UrineUrine A1M, MCP-1, procollagen type III and type I amino-terminal amino pro-peptideGraft failureIn adjusted models, ↑ concentrations of urine A1M (HR per doubling, 1.73; 1.43-2.08) and MCP-1 (HR per doubling, 1.60; 1.32-1.93) were associated with allograft failure. With the adjustment, urine A1M (HR per doubling, 1.76; 95%CI: 1.27-2.44)] and MCP-1 levels (HR per doubling, 1.49; 95%CI: 1.17-1.89) remained associated with allograft failure
Heylen et al[92], 2018154BiopsyDNA methylation1-yr graft function↑ methylation risk scoref at transplant predicted chronic injury at 1 yr (OR 45; 98 to 499; P < 0.001; AUC 0.919) vs standard baseline clinical risk factors, including age, donor criteria, donor last SCr, CIT, anastomosis time, HLA mismatches (combined AUC 0.743) sensitivity, specificity, and PPV, NPV values of MRS-based ROC curves were 90%, 90%, 95%, and 82%
Park et al[70], 20171184 (300 CVD, 371 death, 513 random sub-cohort)UrineUrine A1M MCP-1, PINP and PIIINPCV events, MortalityIn adjusted models, higher urine AlM (HR per doubling of biomarker = 1.40 (95%CI: 1.21 to 1.62), MCP-1 [HR = 1.18 (1.03 to 1.36)], and PINP [HR = 1.13 (95%CI: 1.03 to 1.23) were associated with CVD events. These three markers were also associated with death (HR per doubling A1M = 1.51 (95%CI: 1.32 to 1.72); MCP-1 = 1.31 (1.13 to 1.51); PINP = 1.11 (95%CI: 1.03 to 1.20)
Smedbråten et al[91], 2017382PlasmaCL-L1, CL-K1CV mortality, Graft survival, Patient survival↑CL-L1 (≥ 376 ng/mL) and ↑CL-K1 (≥ 304 ng/mL) levels at transplantation were associated with mortality in multivariate Cox analysesg [HR = 1.50 (95%CI: 1.09 to 2.07) and HR = 1.43 (95%CI: 1.02 to 1.99)] ↑CL-K1 levels were associated with CV mortality. No association between measured biomarkers and death-censored graft loss was found
San Segundo et al[93], 2019133PlasmaAbs number peripheral blood Treg cellsDeath-censored graft survival↑ Treg cells 1 yr post-KTh showed better DCGL (5-yr survival, 92.5% vs 81.4%). 1-yr Treg cellsh showed a ROC AUC of 63.1% (95%CI: 52.9 to 73.2) for predicting DCGL. After multivariate Cox regression analysis, an ↑ number of peripheral blood Treg cellsh was protective factor for DCGL (HR = 0.961 (95%CI: 0.924 to 0.998), irrespective of 1-yr proteinuria and renal function