Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Transplant. Jan 18, 2020; 10(1): 1-14
Published online Jan 18, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i1.1
Published online Jan 18, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i1.1
Therapeutic | Advantages | Limitations/future considerations |
RNAi pathway | Selectively targets and silences/degrades specific genes | Most beneficial/effective siRNA target against liver IRI in transplantation remains to be identified |
Mechanism of siRNA silencing pathway is generally understood | Potential for administration of multiple siRNA constructs each with a different target | |
Organ-specific uptake | Requires design of siRNA against target mRNA and validation of target silencing | |
Permits imaging studies visualizing tissue uptake and distribution | ||
Defatting cocktails | Ability to restore liver function by defatting | Steatotic livers are already predisposed to IRI[32] |
Aimed at enhancing natural lipid metabolism via lipid export, reduction of triglyceride levels, and stimulation of lipid oxidation and ketogenesis | Mechanisms of glucose and lipid control in liver remain poorly defined[69] | |
Undefined consensus for quantifying degree of steatosis[70] | ||
Need for perfusate exchange protocol as secreted triglycerides recirculate causing further increase in lipid deposition[47] | ||
Kinetics of defatting may surpass average timeframe of liver transplantation[48] | ||
Vasodilators | Focused on improving intrinsic function of liver to improve blood flow via smooth muscle relaxation and vasodilation | Effects of vasodilators in marginal grafts remains unclear[61] |
Act to increase arterial flow and decrease post-sinusoidal resistance[71] | Combination of agents does not allow for specific identification of most beneficial agent(s) | |
Anti-inflammatory agents | Some agents also act as vasodilators[68,72,73] | Mechanisms of anti-inflammatory agents remains unexplored in context of ex vivo liver perfusion[9] |
Act to scavenge free radicals to prevent IRI[74] | Combination of agents does not allow for determination of which specific agents were beneficial[9] | |
Ability to protect other cell types such as endothelial cells[75,76] | ||
HLSC-EV | Regenerative and hepatoprotective properties[77,78] | Unknown mechanism of hypoxic protection[65] |
Diverse differentiating capabilities[77] | Timing of EV uptake during NMP currently unknown[65] | |
Contain mRNA and miRNA subsets that modulate activity of target cells[79] | ||
May serve as option for liver diseases without need for stem cells transplantation[65] | ||
δ-opioid agonist (Enkephalin) | Protects against oxidative stress[66] | Unknown therapeutic role in setting of post-perfusion liver transplant model with measured outcomes of graft function[66] |
Prevention of mitochondrial dysfunction via opioid receptor signaling[66] | ||
Protection against IRI by slowing cellular metabolism[80,81] | Unknown role in cold ischemia conditions for liver transplant models[66] | |
NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor (mcc950) | Blocks NLRP3-inflammsome activation preventing inflammatory liver damage[82,83] | mcc950 half-life is 3.27 h, while NLRP3 inflammasome activation lasts for several days after reperfusion[84,85] |
Reduces apoptosis post liver transplantation[67] | Additional mcc950 inhibition studies involving in vitro and in vivo models needed[67] |
- Citation: Buchwald JE, Xu J, Bozorgzadeh A, Martins PN. Therapeutics administered during ex vivo liver machine perfusion: An overview. World J Transplant 2020; 10(1): 1-14
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v10/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v10.i1.1