Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Rheumatol. Jul 12, 2015; 5(2): 82-89
Published online Jul 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.82
Published online Jul 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.82
Ref./registry | No. of pregnancies | Disease | Biologic drugs | Pregnancy stage | Pregnancy outcome |
Lichtenstein et al[61] TREAT registry | 36 | CD | IFX | Any exposure | 11.1% miscarriage (NS), 8.3% neonatal complications (NS) |
Katz et al[62] Infliximab safety database | 96 | CD, UC, RA | IFX | 7 prior to conception, 53 conception, 30 T1, 6 unknown | 67% live births, 15% miscarriages, and 19% elective termination. Results similar to those expected for the general United States population or pregnant women with CD not exposed to infliximab |
Garcia et al[50] BIOBADASER | 14 | RA, AS, PsA | IFX, ETN, ADA | First trimester | 7 live births, 1 miscarriage, 3 therapeutic termination, 3 therapeutic termination, 2 on-going pregnancies, 0 malformations |
Strangfeld et al[10] RABBIT | 37 | IFX, ETN, ADA, ANK | 22 first-trimester (2 restarted biologic after week 20) 15 prior to conception | Similar miscarriage (4.5% vs 6.6%); 0 marformations | |
Johnson et al[17] OTIS | 175 | RA, PsA, AS, CPs | ETN | 139 first trimester 67 disease matched | Similar live births (93.5% vs 88.1%); more miscarriage (14% vs 5% vs 1.1%); malformations (9.4% vs 4.5%) |
Verstappen et al[11] BSRBR | 140 | RA, PsA, JIA, AS, SLE, AOSD | IFX, ETN, ADA | 59 prior conception 71 at conception 10 controls never exposed | In post-conception exposures vs never exposed: less live births (59% vs 100%; P = 0.012), more miscarriages (27% vs 10%; P = 0.437), elective terminations (11% vs 10%; P = 0.587) |
Chambers et al[14] OTIS | 239 | RA, CD | ADA | 94 first trimester 58 disease-matched controls 87 non-disease controls | Similar live births (85% vs 91.4% vs 89.7%), miscarriages (4.3% vs 9%); similar preterm deliveries (15% vs 17% vs 4%); malformations (9.6% vs 5.4% vs 5%) |
- Citation: Mena-Vazquez N, Manrique-Arija S, Fernandez-Nebro A. Safety of biologic therapies during pregnancy in women with rheumatic disease. World J Rheumatol 2015; 5(2): 82-89
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3214/full/v5/i2/82.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.82