Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Rheumatol. Jul 12, 2015; 5(2): 108-126
Published online Jul 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.108
Published online Jul 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.108
Intervention | Outcomes | Studies (references) | Participants | Relative risk (95%CI) or other mesure | I2(%) | P value |
bDMARD monotherapy vs bDMARD + MTX | EULAR good response | 3 (16,17, 30) | 3000 | 0.57 [0.34-0.95] | 82 | 0.0008 |
DAS 28 | 3 (17, 20, 30) | 2913 | 0.25 [-0.02-0.52] | 69 | 0.01 | |
HAQ | 2 (165, 30) | 655 | 0.13 [0.03-0.22] | 0 | 0.43 |
- Citation: Santos JBD, Costa JO, Junior HAO, Lemos LLP, Araújo VE, Machado MA&, Almeida AM, Acurcio FA, Alvares J. What is the best biological treatment for rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic review of effectiveness. World J Rheumatol 2015; 5(2): 108-126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3214/full/v5/i2/108.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.108