Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Rheumatol. Jul 12, 2015; 5(2): 108-126
Published online Jul 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.108
Published online Jul 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.108
Intervention | Outcomes | Studies (references) | n | RR (95%CI)or other mesure | I2(%) | P value |
IFX vs ETA | EULAR good response | 5 (19, 21, 22, 27, 28) | 2822 | 0.82 [0.62-1.09] | 82 | 0.0001 |
EULAR moderate response | 4 (19, 21, 22, 28) | 2366 | 0.90 [0.61-1.33] | 90 | < 0.00001 | |
EULAR no response | 4 (19, 21, 22, 28) | 2366 | 1.29 [1.09-1.53] | 27 | 0.25 | |
DAS 28 remission | 4 (21, 27, 28, 37) | 1804 | 0.82 [0.70-0.95] | 0 | 0.4 | |
ACR 20 | 2 (19, 37) | 1309 | 0.95 [0.86-1.06] | 0 | 0.47 | |
ACR50 | 3 (19, 28, 37) | 2315 | 0.92 [0.81-1.03] | 10 | 0.33 | |
ACR70 | 3 (19, 28, 37) | 2315 | 0.88 [0.57-1.36] | 79 | 0.009 | |
CDAI remission | 3 (27, 28, 37) | 1876 | 0.88 [0.72-1.08] | 0 | 0.93 | |
ADA vs ETA | EULAR good response | 4 (20, 22, 27, 28) | 1590 | 1.11 [1.00-1.23] | 0 | 0.4 |
EULAR moderate response | 3 (20, 22, 28) | 1178 | 1.01 [0.83-1.24] | 19 | 0.29 | |
EULAR no response | 3 (20, 22, 28) | 1178 | 0.69 [0.53-0.89] | 11 | 0.32 | |
DAS 28 remission | 3 (27, 28, 37) | 1380 | 1.03 [0.82-1.29] | 37 | 0.21 | |
ACR 20 | 2 (20, 37) | 445 | 0.89 [0.71-1.12] | 0 | 0.68 | |
ACR 50 | 3 (20, 28, 37) | 1217 | 1.09 [0.91-1.31] | 18 | 0.3 | |
ACR 70 | 3 (20, 28, 37) | 1436 | 1.15 [0.92-1.43] | 0 | 0.82 | |
HAQ reduction | 2 (22, 25) | 653 | -0.07 [-0.16-0.03] | 0 | 0.92 | |
CDAI remission | 3 (27, 28, 37) | 1601 | 1.02 [0.67-1.56] | 72 | 0.03 | |
IFX vs ADA | EULAR good response | 3 (22, 27, 28) | 1706 | 1.42 [1.18-1.72] | 42 | 0.18 |
EULAR moderate response | 2 (22, 28) | 1338 | 0.96 [0.58-1.59] | 80 | 0.03 | |
EULAR no response | 2 (22, 28) | 1338 | 0.56 [0.45-0.69] | 0 | 0.88 | |
DAS 28 remission | 3 (27, 28) | 1648 | 1.23 [0.95-1.59] | 48 | 0.15 | |
ACR 50 | 2 (28, 37) | 1458 | 1.14 [0.71-1.84] | 79 | 0.03 | |
ACR 70 | 2 (28, 37) | 1458 | 1.41 [0.81-2.44] | 72 | 0.06 | |
CDAI remission | 3 (27, 28, 37) | 1875 | 1.17 [0.75-1.82] | 75 | 0.02 |
- Citation: Santos JBD, Costa JO, Junior HAO, Lemos LLP, Araújo VE, Machado MA&, Almeida AM, Acurcio FA, Alvares J. What is the best biological treatment for rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic review of effectiveness. World J Rheumatol 2015; 5(2): 108-126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3214/full/v5/i2/108.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.108