Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Rheumatol. Jul 12, 2015; 5(2): 108-126
Published online Jul 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.108
Published online Jul 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.108
Intervention | Outcomes | Studies (references) | Partici-pants | Relative risk (95%CI) or other mesure | I2(%) | P value |
IFX vs ETA | EULAR good response | 10 (18,19,21,22,24, 26,27, 28, 32,42) | 7247 | 0.86 [0.72-1.02] | 76 | < 0.0001 |
EULAR moderate response | 9 (18,19,21,22,24, 26, 28, 32,42) | 6791 | 0.98 [0.84-1.15] | 78 | < 0.0001 | |
EULAR no response | 9 (18,19,21,22,24, 26, 28, 32,42) | 6791 | 1.20 [1.05-1.38] | 46 | 0.06 | |
DAS 28 remission | 7 (21,26,27,28,32,37,42) | 2868 | 0.70 [0.59-0.84] | 0 | 0.51 | |
DAS 28 | 2 (21,26) | 196 | 0.40 [-0.27- 1.07] | 59 | 0.12 | |
DAS 28 reduction | 2 (15,22) | 1321 | 0.40 [0.04-0.77] | 77 | 0.04 | |
CDAI remission | 4 (27,28,37,42) | 2293 | 0.90 [0.74-1.09] | 0 | 0.89 | |
SDAI remission | 2 (27,42) | 840 | 0.87 [0.61-1.26] | 0 | 0.9 | |
HAQ | 3 (21,26,39) | 495 | 0.14 [0.00-0.27] | 0 | 0.51 | |
ACR 20 | 2 (19,37) | 1309 | 0.95 [0.86-1.06] | 0 | 0.47 | |
ACR50 | 3 (19,28,37) | 2315 | 0.92 [0.81-1.03] | 10 | 0.33 | |
ACR70 | 3 (19,28,37) | 2315 | 0.88 [0.57-1.36] | 79 | 0.009 | |
ADA vs ETA | EULAR good response | 8 (20,22,24,26,27,28,32,42) | 2492 | 0.97 [0.79-1.20] | 73 | 0.0005 |
EULAR moderate response | 7 (20,22,24,26,28,32,42) | 2080 | 1.00 [0.89-1.12] | 0 | 0.48 | |
EULAR no response | 7 (20,22,24,26,28,32,42) | 2080 | 0.90 [0.62-1.32] | 76 | 0.0003 | |
DAS 28 remission | 6 (26,27,28,32,37,42) | 2412 | 0.93 [0.68-1.26] | 80 | 0.0001 | |
DAS 28 | 2 (20,26) | 180 | -0.09 [-0.25-0.06] | 0 | 0.73 | |
DAS 28 reduction | 2 (15,22) | 1392 | 0.17 [-0.19-0.52] | 68 | 0.08 | |
CDAI remission | 4 (27,28,37,42) | 1883 | 1.16 [0.77-1.74] | 70 | 0.02 | |
SDAI remission | 2 (27,42) | 641 | 1.40 [0.76-2.59] | 55 | 0.13 | |
HAQ | 2 (26,39) | 339 | -0.15 [-0.39-0.10] | 49 | 0.16 | |
HAQ reduction | 2 (22,25) | 653 | -0.07 [-0.16-0.03] | 0 | 0.92 | |
ACR 20 | 2 (20,37) | 445 | 0.89 [0.71-1.12] | 0 | 0.68 | |
ACR 50 | 3 (20,28,37) | 1217 | 1.09 [0.91-1.31] | 18 | 0.3 | |
ACR 70 | 3 (20,28,37) | 1436 | 1.15 [0.92-1.43] | 0 | 0.82 | |
IFX vs ADA | EULAR good response | 8 (22,23,24,26,27,28,32,42) | 3025 | 1.25 [1.06-1.47] | 57 | 0.02 |
EULAR moderate response | 7 (22,23,24,26,28,32,42) | 2657 | 0.91 [0.79-1.04] | 31 | 0.19 | |
EULAR no response | 7 (22,23,24,26,28,32,42) | 2657 | 0.77 [0.56-1.05] | 75 | 0.0006 | |
DAS 28 remission | 6 (26,27,28,32,37,42) | 2760 | 1.15 [0.91-1.46] | 63 | 0.02 | |
DAS 28 reduction | 2 (15,22) | 1097 | -0.24 [-0.96-0.48] | 91 | 0.001 | |
CDAI remission | 4 (27,28,37,42) | 2332 | 1.30 [0.90-1.88] | 68 | 0.02 | |
SDAI remission | 2 (27,42) | 765 | 1.66 [0.94-2.93] | 61 | 0.11 | |
HAQ | 2 (26,39) | 182 | -0.33 [-0.53-0.13] | 0 | 0.92 | |
ACR 50 | 2 (28,37) | 1458 | 1.14 [0.71-1.84] | 79 | 0.03 | |
ACR 70 | 2 (28,37) | 1458 | 1.41 [0.81-2.44] | 72 | 0.06 |
- Citation: Santos JBD, Costa JO, Junior HAO, Lemos LLP, Araújo VE, Machado MA&, Almeida AM, Acurcio FA, Alvares J. What is the best biological treatment for rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic review of effectiveness. World J Rheumatol 2015; 5(2): 108-126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3214/full/v5/i2/108.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5499/wjr.v5.i2.108