Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Rheumatol. Mar 12, 2015; 5(1): 36-44
Published online Mar 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i1.36
Table 1 Randomized controlled trials in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis[51]
Trial (n)Inclusion criteriaTreatment groups (dose)Primary end-pointsOutcome
Induction of remission
NORAM (100)New diagnosis of GPA or MPA, and creatinine < 150 μmol/LMethotrexate (0.3 mg/kg once weekly) vs daily oral cyclophosphamideRemission Time to relapseMethotrexate not inferior to cyclophosphamide Time to relapse shorter with methotrexate
CYCLOPS (149)New diagnosis of GPA, MPA, or relapse with renal involvement, creatinine 150-500 μmol/LIntravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (15 mg/kg) vs daily oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg)Remission Time to relapsePulse cyclophosphamide not inferior to oral cyclophosphamide Less leucopenia and trend towards more relapses with pulse cyclophosphamide
RITUXVAS (44)New diagnosis of AAV and severe renal involvementRituximab (four 375 mg/m² infusions) plus two intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide, vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide onlySustained remissionRituximab not inferior to pulse cyclophosphamide
RAVE (198)New or relapsing GPA or MPARituximab (4 × 375 mg/m² infusions) vs daily oral cyclophosphamideComplete remission and cessation of glucocorticoids at 6 moRituximab not inferior to oral cyclophosphamide Rituximab better in patients with relapse than after first diagnosis
MEPEX (137)New diagnosis of GPA or MPA and creatinine > 500 μmol/LPlasma exchange and oral cyclophosphamide vs 3 × intravenous methylprednisolone pulse and oral cyclophosphamideRenal survival at 3 moBetter renal survival with plasma exchange 24% risk reduction for ESRD with plasma exchange
MYCYC (140)New diagnosis of GPA, MPA and major organ involvementMycophenolate mofetil (2-3 g daily) vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (15 mg/kg)Remission at 6 mo RelapsePreliminary data: noninferiority not proven for mycophenolate mofetil vs pulse cyclophosphamide
CORTAGE (104)New diagnosis of MPA, GPA, EGPA, PAN and age > 65 yrRapid glucocorticoid tapering and reduced-dose intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (500 mg) vs standard intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m²)Severe adverse eventsPreliminary data: less severe adverse events with reduced immunosuppression, no difference in remission and relapse rates
Maintenance of remission
CYCAZAREM (144)GPA, MPA or relapse and renal or vital organ involvementOral azathioprine (2 mg/kg) vs oral cyclophosphamide (1.5 mg/kg daily)Relapse Adverse eventsNo difference in relapse
IMPROVE (165)New diagnosis of GPA or MPAOral mycophenolate mofetil (2 g daily) vs oral azathioprine (2 mg/kg)Time without relapse Adverse eventsMore relapses with mycophenolate mofetil than azathioprine, trend towards more adverse events with azathioprine
WEGENT (126)GPA or MPA and renal or multiorgan involvementMethotrexate (0.3 mg/kg once weekly) vs azathioprine (2 mg/kg)Adverse events with consecutive treatment cessation or deathNo difference between groups in primary end point and relapses
LEM (54)Generalized GPA and creatinine < 1.3 mg/dLLeflunomide (30 mg daily) vs methotrexate (up to 20 mg per week)RelapseMore relapses with methotrexate than leflunomide, trend towards more adverse events with leflunomide
WGET (174)GPA and BVAS > 3Etanercept and methotrexate or cyclophosphamide vs placebo and methotrexate or cyclophosphamideSustained remission for > 6 moNo benefit with etanercept, more cancers in etanercept group