Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Rheumatol. Mar 12, 2015; 5(1): 36-44
Published online Mar 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i1.36
Published online Mar 12, 2015. doi: 10.5499/wjr.v5.i1.36
Trial (n) | Inclusion criteria | Treatment groups (dose) | Primary end-points | Outcome |
Induction of remission | ||||
NORAM (100) | New diagnosis of GPA or MPA, and creatinine < 150 μmol/L | Methotrexate (0.3 mg/kg once weekly) vs daily oral cyclophosphamide | Remission Time to relapse | Methotrexate not inferior to cyclophosphamide Time to relapse shorter with methotrexate |
CYCLOPS (149) | New diagnosis of GPA, MPA, or relapse with renal involvement, creatinine 150-500 μmol/L | Intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (15 mg/kg) vs daily oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg) | Remission Time to relapse | Pulse cyclophosphamide not inferior to oral cyclophosphamide Less leucopenia and trend towards more relapses with pulse cyclophosphamide |
RITUXVAS (44) | New diagnosis of AAV and severe renal involvement | Rituximab (four 375 mg/m² infusions) plus two intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide, vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide only | Sustained remission | Rituximab not inferior to pulse cyclophosphamide |
RAVE (198) | New or relapsing GPA or MPA | Rituximab (4 × 375 mg/m² infusions) vs daily oral cyclophosphamide | Complete remission and cessation of glucocorticoids at 6 mo | Rituximab not inferior to oral cyclophosphamide Rituximab better in patients with relapse than after first diagnosis |
MEPEX (137) | New diagnosis of GPA or MPA and creatinine > 500 μmol/L | Plasma exchange and oral cyclophosphamide vs 3 × intravenous methylprednisolone pulse and oral cyclophosphamide | Renal survival at 3 mo | Better renal survival with plasma exchange 24% risk reduction for ESRD with plasma exchange |
MYCYC (140) | New diagnosis of GPA, MPA and major organ involvement | Mycophenolate mofetil (2-3 g daily) vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (15 mg/kg) | Remission at 6 mo Relapse | Preliminary data: noninferiority not proven for mycophenolate mofetil vs pulse cyclophosphamide |
CORTAGE (104) | New diagnosis of MPA, GPA, EGPA, PAN and age > 65 yr | Rapid glucocorticoid tapering and reduced-dose intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (500 mg) vs standard intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m²) | Severe adverse events | Preliminary data: less severe adverse events with reduced immunosuppression, no difference in remission and relapse rates |
Maintenance of remission | ||||
CYCAZAREM (144) | GPA, MPA or relapse and renal or vital organ involvement | Oral azathioprine (2 mg/kg) vs oral cyclophosphamide (1.5 mg/kg daily) | Relapse Adverse events | No difference in relapse |
IMPROVE (165) | New diagnosis of GPA or MPA | Oral mycophenolate mofetil (2 g daily) vs oral azathioprine (2 mg/kg) | Time without relapse Adverse events | More relapses with mycophenolate mofetil than azathioprine, trend towards more adverse events with azathioprine |
WEGENT (126) | GPA or MPA and renal or multiorgan involvement | Methotrexate (0.3 mg/kg once weekly) vs azathioprine (2 mg/kg) | Adverse events with consecutive treatment cessation or death | No difference between groups in primary end point and relapses |
LEM (54) | Generalized GPA and creatinine < 1.3 mg/dL | Leflunomide (30 mg daily) vs methotrexate (up to 20 mg per week) | Relapse | More relapses with methotrexate than leflunomide, trend towards more adverse events with leflunomide |
WGET (174) | GPA and BVAS > 3 | Etanercept and methotrexate or cyclophosphamide vs placebo and methotrexate or cyclophosphamide | Sustained remission for > 6 mo | No benefit with etanercept, more cancers in etanercept group |
- Citation: Moiseev SV, Novikov PI. Classification, diagnosis and treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis. World J Rheumatol 2015; 5(1): 36-44
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3214/full/v5/i1/36.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5499/wjr.v5.i1.36