Opinion Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Med Genet. Sep 20, 2024; 12(1): 93011
Published online Sep 20, 2024. doi: 10.5496/wjmg.v12.i1.93011
Table 3 Genome-wide identification of circular RNAs: How it began
Ref.
Genome-wide identification of circRNAs
Salzman et al[18], 2012Aimed to distinguish cancer-specific exon scrambling events
Identified 2748 scrambled isoforms in Hela and H9 embryonic stem cells
Conclusion: 98% of scrambled isoforms represent circRNAs
Jeck et al[8], 2013Classified circular transcripts based on their levels of abundance using three stringencies categories (low, medium, high)
Conclusion: circRNAs are conserved, stable, and nonrandom products of RNA splicing that could be involved in the control of gene expression
Memczak et al[7], 2013Developed a computational method to detect circRNAs
Conclusion: circRNAs form a significant class of post-transcriptional regulators
Guo et al[19], 2014Identified and quantified human circRNAs from ENCODE Ribozero RNA-seq data
Conclusion: Most circRNAs are nonsignificant side-products of splicing error
Zhang et al[20], 2014Developed CIRCexplorer to distinguish thousands of circRNAs in humans with p(A)-wloRNase R RNA-seq data
Conclusion: Alternative circularization paired with alternative splicing can generate additional circRNAs from one gene, which is suggestive of the new line of complexity in gene regulation