Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Infect Dis. May 25, 2016; 6(2): 6-21
Published online May 25, 2016. doi: 10.5495/wjcid.v6.i2.6
Table 3 Limitations of the present studies that identify differentially expressed genes between latently infected and uninfected cells and possible solutions that may enable identification of solid candidate biomarkers of latency
LimitationsSolutions
Small percentage of latently infected cellsIsolate latently infected cells using reporter system OR perform gene expression profiling on a single-cell level
Effect from the exposure to the virus without infectionUse aldrithiol-2 inactivated virus[123] instead of mock-infection to compare to latently infected cell model
Identified differentially expressed genes are ubiquitously expressed on all CD4+ T cellsIdentify a panel of biomarkers that best differentiates between latently infected and uninfected cells
Different models represent different aspects of latency establishmentInclude additional models into analysis; use same statistical approaches to ensure differences in biomarkers are biological, not technical differences
Gene expression profiling can only identify candidate biomarkersPerform experimental validation that latently infected cells can be detected using these biomarkers