Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Infect Dis. May 25, 2016; 6(2): 6-21
Published online May 25, 2016. doi: 10.5495/wjcid.v6.i2.6
Table 2 Features of gene expression studies comparing latently infected vs uninfected cells
Study characteristicsKrishnan and Zeichner[18]Iglesias-Ussel et al[19]Mohammadi et al[42]Evans et al[76]
Cells usedCell lines ACH-2, A3.01, J1.1Primary CD4+ T cellsPrimary CD4+ T cells co-cultured with feeder H80 human brain tumor cell linePrimary resting CD4+ T cells co-cultured with dendritic cells
Virus usedCXCR4 tropic HIV-1 LAV strainCXCR4 tropic GFP reporter virus (GFP inserted in place of Nef)CXCR4 tropic GFP reporter virus with mutations in Gag, Vif, Vpr, Vpu, Env and NefCCR5 tropic GFP reporter virus (GFP inserted into the Nef open reading frame)
Proportion of uninfected cells ≤ 1.1%0%8%-18%99.7%
Proportion of GFP+ or p24+ cells8.20%8.15%Approximately 16%0% (removed by sorting)
Proportion of latently infected cells98.9%100%Approximately 82%-92%Approximately 0.3%
Time of cultureN/A (chronically infected)20-22 d13 wk5 d
Experiment replicates84Not reported4
Gene expression profiling platformMicroarrays (Hs. UniGem2)Microarrays (Agilent-012391 Whole Human Genome Oligo Microarray G4112A)RNA-Seq (polyA RNA library; Illumina HiSeq2000)Microarrays (Illumina Human-Ref8)
Method to identify DEGsParametric one-sample random variance t-test (BRB-Array Tools, P < 0.001)Linear modeling and using an empirical Bayes method with FDR correction (limma)Generalized linear modeling (DESeq, FDR < 0.05)Linear modeling and using an empirical Bayes method (limma, FDR < 0.05)
Databases used for functional analysesNIH mAdbGO consortium;Reactome pathways Ver.40;IPA
MsigDb;MsigDb
KEGG pathways
Total number of DEGs32875227Not reported