Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Infect Dis. Apr 26, 2022; 12(1): 20-32
Published online Apr 26, 2022. doi: 10.5495/wjcid.v12.i1.20
Published online Apr 26, 2022. doi: 10.5495/wjcid.v12.i1.20
Figure 2 Effect of brpR and brpS mutations and complementation on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation.
All experiments represent the mean ± SD from five different runs done in triplicate for each strain. Biofilm formation was done on wild-type Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) strain Newman (WT, open column), S. aureus Newman srtA mutant (black column), S. aureus Newman brpS mutant (right striped column), S. aureus Newman brpS mutant/pAMZ1-3 (left striped column), S. aureus Newman brpR mutant (dark right striped column), and S. aureus Newman brpR mutant/pXB31 (dark left striped column). Differences were statistically compared by analysis of variance where aP < 0.001.
- Citation: Zank A, Schulte L, Brandon X, Carstensen L, Wescott A, Schwan WR. Mutations of the brpR and brpS genes affect biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. World J Clin Infect Dis 2022; 12(1): 20-32
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3176/full/v12/i1/20.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5495/wjcid.v12.i1.20